Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33305338›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2021

The histopathological diagnosis of atypical meningioma: glass slide versus whole slide imaging for grading assessment.

Serena Ammendola, Elena Bariani, Albino Eccher, Arrigo Capitanio, Claudio Ghimenton, Liron Pantanowitz, Anil Parwani, Ilaria Girolami, Aldo Scarpa, Valeria Barresi

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Serena AmmendolaDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Elena BarianiDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Albino EccherDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Arrigo CapitanioDepartment of Clinical Pathology, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Claudio GhimentonDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Liron PantanowitzDepartment of Pathology & Clinical Labs, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Anil ParwaniDepartment of Pathology, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Ilaria GirolamiDivision of Pathology, Central Hospital Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Aldo ScarpaDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Valeria BarresiDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. valeria.barresi@univr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7086-1920
University of Verona · ITLinköping University · SEOspedale di Bolzano · ITThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Università degli Studi di Verona FUR 2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limited studies on whole slide imaging (WSI) in surgical neuropathology reported a perceived limitation in the recognition of mitoses. This study analyzed and compared the inter- and intra-observer concordance for atypical meningioma, using glass slides and WSI. Two neuropathologists and two residents assessed the histopathological features of 35 meningiomas-originally diagnosed as atypical-in a representative glass slide and corresponding WSI. For each histological parameter and final diagnosis, we calculated the inter- and intra-observer concordance in the two viewing modes and the predictive accuracy on recurrence. The concordance rates for atypical meningioma on glass slides and on WSI were 54% and 60% among four observers and 63% and 74% between two neuropathologists. The inter-observer agreement was higher using WSI than with glass slides for all parameters, with the exception of high mitotic index. For all histological features, we found median intra-observer concordance of ≥ 79% and similar predictive accuracy for recurrence between the two viewing modes. The higher concordance for atypical meningioma using WSI than with glass slides and the similar predictive accuracy for recurrence in the two modalities suggest that atypical meningioma may be safely diagnosed using WSI.

Indexed as

HumansMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaNeoplasm GradingObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsAtypical meningiomaDigitalRecurrenceReproducibilityWhole slide imaging

Identifiers

PMID33305338
PMCPMC7990834
OpenAlexW3112825461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.