Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33305090›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

MRI Radiomics for Prediction of Tumor Response and Downstaging in Rectal Cancer Patients after Preoperative Chemoradiation.

Haihui Chen, Liting Shi, Ky Nam Bao Nguyen, Arta M Monjazeb, Karen E Matsukuma, Thomas W Loehfelm, Haixin Huang, Jianfeng Qiu, Yi Rong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The Role of Radiomics in Rectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Haihui ChenDepartment of Medical Oncology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou, China.
Liting ShiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California.
Ky Nam Bao NguyenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California.
Arta M MonjazebDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California.
Karen E MatsukumaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California.
Thomas W LoehfelmDepartment of Radiology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California.
Haixin HuangDepartment of Medical Oncology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou, China.
Jianfeng QiuMedical Engineering and Technology Research Center, Imaging-X Joint Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.
Yi RongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to investigate radiomic features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans performed before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in predicting response of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-nine patients who underwent nCRT for LARC were included, with 294 radiomic features extracted from MRI that was performed before (pre-CRT) and 6 to 8 weeks after completing nCRT (post-CRT). Based on tumor regression grade (TRG), 26 patients were classified as having a histopathologic good response (GR; TRG 0-1) and 13 as non-GR (TRG 2-3). Tumor downstaging (T-downstaging) occurred in 25 patients. Univariate analyses were performed to assess potential radiomic and delta-radiomic predictors for TRG in pathologic complete response (pCR) versus non-pCR, GR versus non-GR, and T-downstaging. The support vector machine-based multivariate model was used to select the best predictors for TRG and T-downstaging.

resultsWe identified 13 predictive features for pCR versus non-pCR, 14 for GR versus non-GR, and 16 for T-downstaging. Pre-CRT gray-level run length matrix nonuniformity, pre-CRT neighborhood intensity difference matrix (NIDM) texture strength, and post-CRT NIDM busyness predicted all 3 treatment responses. The best predictor for GR versus non-GR was pre-CRT global minimum combined with clinical N stage in the multivariate analysis. The best predictor for T-downstaging was the combination of pre-CRT gray-level co-occurrence matrix correlation, NIDM-texture strength, and gray-level co-occurrence matrix variance. The pre-CRT, post-CRT, and delta radiomic-based models had no significant difference in predicting all 3 responses.

conclusionsPre-CRT MRI, post-CRT MRI, and delta radiomic-based models have the potential to predict tumor response after nCRT in LARC. These data, if validated in larger cohorts, can provide important predictive information to aid in clinical decision making.

Identifiers

PMID33305090
PMCPMC7718560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.