Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33305072›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Index and Nonindex Pain Endpoints in Radiation Therapy for Painful Tumors: A Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Observational Study.

Tetsuo Saito, Naoki Nakamura, Kenta Murotani, Naoto Shikama, Takeo Takahashi, Atsunori Yorozu, Joichi Heianna, Hikaru Kubota, Etsushi Tomitaka, Ryo Toya and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Quality of life improvement in patients with bone metastases undergoing palliative radiotherapy.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2022
    Article
  3. Palliative radiotherapy for painful lymph node metastases.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2021
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Tetsuo SaitoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Naoki NakamuraDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Kenta MurotaniBiostatistics Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kurume University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Naoto ShikamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeo TakahashiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Japan.
Atsunori YorozuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Joichi HeiannaDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science University of The Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.
Hikaru KubotaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kobe University Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Etsushi TomitakaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kumamoto Medical Center, Kumamoto, Japan.
Ryo ToyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kohsei YamaguchiDepartment of Radiology, Amakusa Central Hospital, Amakusa, Japan.
Natsuo OyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kumamoto University Hospital · JPKurume University · JPJuntendo University · JPKobe University Hospital · JPKumamoto Medical Center · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPSocial Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital · JPTokyo Medical Center · JPUniversity of the Ryukyus · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeImproving pain interference in daily activities, rather than mere pain reduction, is a desirable endpoint for palliative radiation therapy. The association between pain response and pain interference has been studied almost exclusively in patients with painful bone metastases (PBMs), whereas nonindex pain has scarcely been explored in palliative radiation therapy. We investigated whether index and nonindex pain endpoints are associated with pain interference changes in patients with both PBMs and painful non-bone-metastasis tumors (PNTs). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Brief pain inventory data collected at baseline and at 2 months post-treatment were used to calculate differences in pain interference scores. Pain response in terms of the index pain was assessed using the international consensus endpoint. Patients were diagnosed with predominance of other pain (POP) if nonindex pain of malignant or unknown origin was present and had a greater pain score than the index pain.

resultsOf 302 patients, 127 (42%) had PBMs and 175 (58%) had PNTs. The median pain interference score, which is based on the mean of the 7 subscale items, decreased to a greater extent among responders than among nonresponders (PBM group: -3.43 vs -0.57 [

conclusionsThe index and nonindex pain endpoints were positively and negatively associated with improvement in pain interference, respectively. There was no apparent difference between patients with PBMs and PNTs in terms of the associations of these endpoints with pain interference.

Identifiers

PMID33305072
PMCPMC7718541
OpenAlexW3095868030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.