ArticleCureus2020
Impact of Mode of Delivery on the Survival Rate of Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Single-Center Experience.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of mode of delivery on incidence of retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2024Pooled it
- Early prediction of mortality and morbidities in VLBW preterm neonates using machine learning.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Determinants of Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Ibadan, Nigeria: The influence of maternal lifestyle.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Gut Microbes and Circulating Cytokines in Preterm Infants with Growth Failure.The Journal of nutrition · 2023Article
- Analysis of risk factors of early intraventricular hemorrhage in very-low-birth-weight premature infants: a single center retrospective study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Comparison of diagnostic value of two-dimensional ultrasound and clinical examination in fetal weight estimation.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWorldwide cesarean birth had increased over the past three decades and in the USA, the overall rate of cesarean birth has increased from 23.8% in 1989 to 31.9% in 2018. Moreover, the substantial increase of preterm infants delivered by cesarean section had reached anywhere from 45% to 72% for gestational age <33 weeks. There is a considerable debate on whether cesarean section confers a survival advantage for preterm infants. Published data on the relationship between mode of delivery and survival rate were inconsistent and there is a lack of large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have investigated this important clinical concern. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of cesarean section on the survival rate of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of ≤32 weeks VLBW infants born alive and admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at King Abdulaziz Medical City-Jeddah (KAMC-Jeddah) between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 2019. The primary outcome of interest was the survival rate to discharge of VLBW infants delivered by cesarean section compared to delivered vaginally. Relevant demographic and clinical variables were assessed and its association to survival to discharge of VLBW infants were analyzed.
resultsOf the 1055 ≤32 weeks VLBW infants included in the study, 559 (53%) were delivered by cesarean section, and 496 (47%) were delivered vaginally. Cesarean delivery had increased from 44.2% to 66% between 1994-1998 and 2014-2019, respectively. The rise of cesarean delivery compared with the vaginal delivery was more profound for gestational age ≤26 weeks and birth weight ≤800 g. The VLBW infants delivered by cesarean section had a higher survival rate when compared to infants delivered vaginally (87.29% vs 71.77%, P<0.001). The survival advantage was statistically significant in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants (801-1000 g) and infants with birth weight ≤800 g, 86.73% vs 73.62%, P=0.018 and 58.02% vs 40.52, P=0.001, respectively. Moreover, VLBW infants ≤26 weeks gestational age delivered by cesarean section had a higher survival rate of 69.15% vs 44.5%, P<0.001.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that cesarean birth is associated with higher survival for VLBW infants with birth weight ≤800 g and ELBW infants and gestational age ≤26 weeks compared to vaginal birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.