Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33304694›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Comparison of the Outcomes of Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in the Treatment of Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Multicenter Measurement Study Done in Two Hospital Centers in Lebanon.

Mohamad K Moussa, Ali Moussa, Firas Nasr, Zaynab Khalaf, Safaa Sarout, Nabil Moukarzel, Alfred Dib

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of Outcomes of Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in the Treatment of Mechanically Ventilated Critically ill Patients.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohamad K MoussaOrthopedic Surgery, Lebanese University, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Beirut, LBN.
Ali MoussaPediatrics, Lebanese University, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Beirut, LBN.
Firas NasrInternal Medicine and Geriatrics, Lebanese University, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Beirut, LBN.
Zaynab KhalafEndocrinology: Diabetes and Metabolism, Lebanese University, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Beirut, LBN.
Safaa SaroutPediatrics, Lebanese University, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Beirut, LBN.
Nabil MoukarzelOtolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, Sacre-Coeur Hospital, Beirut, LBN.
Alfred DibCritical Care Medicine, Sacre-Coeur Hospital, Beirut, LBN.
Lebanese University · LBSacred Heart Hospital · IEHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background  Benefits of early tracheostomy (ET) versus late tracheostomy (LT) while treating critically ill patients have been a matter of big debate in the last few years. Several meta-analyses tried to prove the benefits of ET in decreasing the duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and the mortality rates. However, no clear guidelines are available yet. This study will focus on comparing the outcomes of early tracheostomy versus late one. Methods This is a retrospective study done in two medical and surgical ICUs at "Sacre-Coeur Hospital" and "Rafik Hariri University Hospital" at Beirut, where we reviewed various files of patients who underwent elective tracheostomy for prolonged MV from January 2015 to June 2016. ET and LT were assumed to be procedures performed respectively before and after 10 days of MV. These two groups were subdivided based on the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score calculated in the first 24 hours of ICU admission. Data about short- and long-term mortality, the duration of MV, and the length of ICU stay were collected and compared. Results From a total of 45 patients, only 25 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of whom 12 (48%) underwent ET and 13 (52%) patients underwent LT. In patients with APACHE II <25 (6 ET and 6 LT), ET was associated with 50% long-term mortality, 9.6 days mean duration of MV and 23 days mean length of ICU stay compared to 57% (P-value=0.05), 78 days (P-value=0.04) and 79 days (P-value=0.012) of respective parameters in LT groups. In patients with APACHE II >25 (6 ET and 7 LT), ET was associated with 50% long-term mortality, 8.6 days mean duration of MV and 24 days mean length of ICU stay compared to 84%, 105 days, 84 days of respective parameter in LT groups. Conclusions Our results are suggestive of the superiority of ET because it was associated with a reduced duration of MV, a decrease in the length of ICU stay, and, most importantly, a lower long-term mortality rate.

Indexed as

apache-ii scorecritically ill patientsearly tracheostomyprolonged mechanical ventilationtrahceostomy

Identifiers

PMID33304694
PMCPMC7720922
OpenAlexW3096263420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.