ArticleCureus2020
Incidental Finding of a Duplicated Vertebral Artery Followed by a Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistula on Spinal Angiography.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accessory left vertebral artery with the inferior thyroid branch: A report of anatomical variant.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Anatomic and hemodynamic characterization of vertebral artery duplication via color doppler ultrasonography.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Duplicated origin of the vertebral artery (VA) is an extremely rare normal anatomic variant. While most often considered non-pathological, duplicated origin carries an increased risk of dissection. An association with vascular pathologies such as aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations, and AV fistulas has been suggested. The objective is to describe this unusual anatomic variant with is concomitant vascular pathology and review current literature. The authors report a case of incidentally-discovered duplicated origin of the left VA in patients with a spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (dAVF). A 61-year-old man with a history significant for sarcoidosis presented with progressive lower extremity weakness and paresthesias. MRI of the thoracic spine demonstrated significant confluent edema and patchy contrast enhancement in the caudal spinal cord and conus medullaris which did not appear related to the patient's neurosarcoidosis. A diagnostic spinal angiogram incidentally demonstrated that the left V1 segment had a duplicated origin, one branch arising from the aortic arch and the other branch arising from the left subclavian artery, with union at the C5 transverse foramen. This finding represented an incidental anomaly discovery was noted to be incidental and was not believed to be related to the patients underlying pathology. Subsequently, a dAVF was discovered, originating from the right T7 spinal artery. Location of this vascular malformation directly correlated with the patient's symptoms. The patient then underwent embolization of the spinal dAVF and recovered uneventfully. Duplicated origin of the VA is an extremely rare but well-described variant, most commonly involving the left VA. To our knowledge, this is the only reported spinal dAVF associated with duplicated origin of the left VA. An association with other pathological entities has been suggested, and thus this case adds to a growing body of cases characterizing these relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.