ArticleCureus2020
Arrhythmia in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Six-Month Retrospective Analysis From the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a devastating medical emergency that requires immediate pharmacological and radiological intervention. With the advent of techniques such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), pacemakers, and percussion pacing, survival rates have improved significantly. However, there are certain factors and complications associated with AMI that still lead to a high mortality rate, such as old age, advanced heart disease, diabetes mellitus (DM), and arrhythmias. Factors such as the type of arrhythmia, the heart rate, and the level at which dissociation occurs between atrial and ventricular rhythm all influence mortality and morbidity rates. Outcomes are further influenced by the sex of the patient, the type of AMI [ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)], history of smoking, arrival times at the hospital, presence of hyperglycemia, previous history of cardiac surgery, and the need for a temporary pacemaker or a permanent pacemaker. As with most scientific studies, local data from Pakistan is hard to find on this topic as well. With this study, we hope to contribute valuable information and updates to the study of a developing problem from the developing world. Objective We aimed to analyze the frequency and outcomes of different types of arrhythmia in AMI. Methods This study involved a retrospective observational cohort. It was conducted at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Karachi from January 2019 to July 2019 (six months). All data were retrieved from the online database at the NICVD. Written consent was obtained from all patients. Patient confidentiality was ensured at all times. Results A total of 500 patients were included in the study. The mean age of our cohort was 56.17 ±14.01 years. NSTEMI was more prevalent than STEMI. Sinus arrhythmia (SA) was the most frequently recorded arrhythmia and had the best survival rates. Atrioventricular (AV) nodal blocks and ventricular tachycardia (VT) had the worst outcomes. The overall mortality rate was 11.4%, and the mean in-hospital length of stay was 2.07 ±1.54 days. Smoking increased mortality in all cases. Conclusions AMI is complicated by several types of arrhythmia. SA is the most common arrhythmia in AMI. Mortality in AMI is largely due to AV nodal blocks and VT. Smoking increases mortality in all cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.