ArticleBiomedical physics & engineering express2019
A conceptual study on real-time adaptive radiation therapy optimization through ultra-fast beamlet control.
Article in Biomedical physics & engineering express, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A central problem in the field of radiation therapy (RT) is how to optimally deliver dose to a patient in a way that fully accounts for anatomical position changes over time. As current RT is a static process, where beam intensities are calculated before the start of treatment, anatomical deviations can result in poor dose conformity. To overcome these limitations, we present a simulation study on a fully dynamic real-time adaptive radiation therapy (RT-ART) optimization approach that uses ultra-fast beamlet control to dynamically adapt to patient motion in real-time. A virtual RT-ART machine was simulated with a rapidly rotating linear accelerator (LINAC) source (60 RPM) and a binary 1D multi-leaf collimator (MLC) operating at 100 Hz. If the real-time tracked target motion exceeded a predefined threshold, a time dependent objective function was solved using fast optimization methods to calculate new beamlet intensities that were then delivered to the patient. To evaluate the approach, system response was analyzed for patient derived continuous drift, step-like, and periodic intra-fractional motion. For each motion type investigated, the RT-ART method was compared against the ideal case with no patient motion (static case) as well as to the case without the use RT-ART. In all cases, isodose lines and dose-volume-histograms (DVH) showed that RT-ART plan quality was approximately the same as the static case, and considerably better than the no RT-ART case. Based on tests using several different motion types, RT-ART was able to recover dose conformity to the level that it was similar to an ideal RT delivery with no anatomical changes. With continued advances in real-time patient motion tracking and fast computational processes, there is significant potential for the RT-ART optimization process to be realized on next generation RT machines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.