Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33304517›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Skin resistance to water gain and loss has changed in cane toads (

Georgia K Kosmala, Gregory P Brown, Richard Shine, Keith Christian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Vasoconstrictor and hemodynamic effects of a methanolic extract from Rhinella marina toad poison.Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Intergenerational effects of manipulating DNA methylation in the early life of an iconic invader.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Georgia K KosmalaSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Sydney Sydney NSW Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3385-5710
Gregory P BrownSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Sydney Sydney NSW Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2924-9040
Richard ShineSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Sydney Sydney NSW Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7529-5657
Keith ChristianResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods Charles Darwin University Darwin NT Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6135-1670
The University of Sydney · AUCharles Darwin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The water-permeable skin of amphibians renders them highly sensitive to climatic conditions, and interspecific correlations between environmental moisture levels and rates of water exchange across the skin suggest that natural selection adapts hydroregulatory mechanisms to local challenges. How quickly can such mechanisms shift when a species encounters novel moisture regimes? Cutaneous resistance to water loss and gain in wild-caught cane toads (

Indexed as

abiotic challengesAnuraBufo marinusphysiologywater balance

Identifiers

PMID33304517
PMCPMC7713918
OpenAlexW3092961316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.