Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33304504›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Modeling mycorrhizal fungi dispersal by the mycophagous swamp wallaby (

Melissa A Danks, Natalie Simpson, Todd F Elliott, C E Timothy Paine, Karl Vernes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Melissa A DanksCentre for Ecosystem Management Edith Cowan University Joondalup WA Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4044-6694
Natalie SimpsonEnvironmental and Rural Science University of New England Armidale NSW Australia.
Todd F ElliottEnvironmental and Rural Science University of New England Armidale NSW Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9304-7040
C E Timothy PaineEnvironmental and Rural Science University of New England Armidale NSW Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8705-3719
Karl VernesEnvironmental and Rural Science University of New England Armidale NSW Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1635-9950

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the importance of mammal-fungal interactions, tools to estimate the mammal-assisted dispersal distances of fungi are lacking. Many mammals actively consume fungal fruiting bodies, the spores of which remain viable after passage through their digestive tract. Many of these fungi form symbiotic relationships with trees and provide an array of other key ecosystem functions. We present a flexible, general model to predict the distance a mycophagous mammal would disperse fungal spores. We modeled the probability of spore dispersal by combining animal movement data from GPS telemetry with data on spore gut-retention time. We test this model using an exemplar generalist mycophagist, the swamp wallaby (

Indexed as

animal‐mediated dispersaldispersal distance kernelectomycorrhizal fungifungal dispersalmammal‐fungal interactionmycophagyspore dispersalspore dispersal distancetruffle‐like fungi

Identifiers

PMID33304504
PMCPMC7713961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.