Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33304403›Full record

ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2020

Investigating cystic lung disease: a respiratory detective approach.

Samantha Ennis, Elizabeth J Silverstone, Deborah H Yates

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samantha EnnisDept of Thoracic Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, Australia.
Elizabeth J SilverstoneDept of Medical Imaging, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, Australia.
Deborah H YatesDept of Thoracic Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6419-6856
St Vincent's Hospital Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cystic lung diseases are rare orphan lung disorders that most physicians will see infrequently in their everyday practice. Diagnostic and treatment options have improved over recent decades, with opportunities for slowing rate of progression and improving outcome for patients. This review provides a summary of the clinical approach to these lung disorders, including how to differentiate between different imaging patterns, clinical features, differential diagnosis and characteristics of the commonest presenting disorders. EDUCATIONAL

aimsTo understand the clinical, pathological and radiological features of cystic lung disordersTo explore the differential diagnosis of cystic lung diseaseTo be familiar with the key features (clinical, radiological, physiological and pathological) of the commoner cystic lung diseases, which assist in differentiating between these.

Identifiers

PMID33304403
PMCPMC7714545
OpenAlexW3059831201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.