Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33304267›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2020

Effectiveness of an Innovative Cognitive Treatment and Telerehabilitation on Subjects With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Multicenter, Randomized, Active-Controlled Study.

Rosa Manenti, Elena Gobbi, Francesca Baglio, Ambra Macis, Clarissa Ferrari, Ilaria Pagnoni, Federica Rossetto, Sonia Di Tella, Federica Alemanno, Vincenzo Cimino and 5 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03486704 nacompletednot on this map

The Italian Network of Telerehabilitation: Evaluation of Telerehabilitation System in Mild Cognitive Impairment

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio FatebenefratelliRan2018 to 2024Enrolled109ConditionsMild Cognitive ImpairmentArmsFace to Face VRRS and telerehabilitation, Usual rehabilitation program, FTF VRRS plus unstructured CS, Face to Face VRRS plus active tDCS and telerehabilitation, Face to Face VRRS plus placebo tDCS and telerehabilitation
NCT07722169 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Home-based Virtual Reality Cognitive Training as an add-on to Telerehabilitation in Alzheimer's Disease: Validation of a Protocol to Slow Down Cognitive Decline and Reduce Caregivers' Burden

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS San RaffaeleRan2026 to 2029Enrolled48ConditionsAlzheimerArmsOnline cognitive telerehabilitation, VRRS tablet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation modulates serumFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rosa ManentiNeuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Elena GobbiNeuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Francesca BaglioIRCCS, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi - ONLUS, Milan, Italy.
Ambra MacisService of Statistics, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Clarissa FerrariService of Statistics, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Ilaria PagnoniNeuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Federica RossettoIRCCS, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi - ONLUS, Milan, Italy.
Sonia Di TellaIRCCS, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi - ONLUS, Milan, Italy.
Federica AlemannoDepartment of Rehabilitation and Functional Recovery, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Vincenzo CiminoIRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo," Messina, Italy.
Giuliano BinettiMAC Memory Clinic and Molecular Markers Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Sandro IannacconeDepartment of Rehabilitation and Functional Recovery, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Placido BramantiIRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo," Messina, Italy.
Stefano F CappaNEtS, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS-Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Maria CotelliNeuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITDon Carlo Gnocchi Foundation · ITCentro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo · ITFondazione FADOI · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, the potential usefulness of cognitive training procedures in normal aging and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) have received increased attention.

objectiveThe main aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the face-to-face cognitive virtual reality rehabilitation system (VRRS) and to compare it to that of face-to-face cognitive treatment as usual for individuals with MCI. Moreover, we assessed the possibility of prolonging the effects of treatment with a telerehabilitation system.

methodsA total of 49 subjects with MCI were assigned to 1 of 3 study groups in a randomized controlled trial design: (a) those who received face-to-face cognitive VRRS (12 sessions of individualized cognitive rehabilitation over 4 weeks) followed by telerehabilitation (36 sessions of home-based cognitive VRRS training, three sessions for week); (b) those who received face-to-face cognitive VRRS followed by at-home unstructured cognitive stimulation (36 sessions of home-based unstructured cognitive stimulation, three sessions for week); and (c) those who received face-to-face cognitive treatment as usual (12 sessions of face-to-face cognitive treatment as usual).

resultsAn improvement in memory, language and visuo-constructional abilities was observed after the end of face-to-face VRRS treatment compared to face-to-face treatment as usual. The application of home-based cognitive VRRS telerehabilitation seems to induce more maintenance of the obtained gains than home-based unstructured stimulation. DISCUSSION: The present study provides preliminary evidence in support of individualized VRRS treatment and telerehabilitation delivery for cognitive rehabilitation and should pave the way for future studies aiming at identifying optimal cognitive treatment protocols in subjects with MCI. CLINICAL

trial registrationwww.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03486704.

Indexed as

cognitivedementiahomemild cognitive impairmenttelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID33304267
PMCPMC7701275
OpenAlexW3100065348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.