ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2020
A Prospective, Multicenter, Pilot Trial Of A Novel Homologous Skin Construct On Deep Partial-Thickness And Full-Thickness Burns.
Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating the effects of a novel autologous heterogeneous skin construct in the treatment of Wagner one diabetic foot ulcers: Final analysis.International wound journal · 2023Trial
- A multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the effects of a novel autologous, heterogeneous skin construct in the treatment of Wagner one diabetic foot ulcers: Interim analysis.International wound journal · 2022Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) is the standard of care for treating deep burns. They often contract, have unpredictable cosmetic outcomes, lack dermal appendages, and result in painful, conspicuous donor sites. An autologous homologous skin construct (AHSC) has been shown to produce full-thickness skin architecture. This study examined the safety profile, engraftment, and quality of healing of a pilot group of AHSC-treated burn wounds. Following IRB approval and informed consent, patients with deep-partial/full-thickness burns requiring grafting underwent side-by-side treatment with AHSC and STSG. A 2 cm2 fullthickness harvest was processed into AHSC at an FDA-registered facility, returned within 48 hours, and applied to a 4 cm2 area alongside a STSG. AHSC donor site was closed primarily. Wounds were evaluated for healing with digital photography and investigator assessments for 90 days. All adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Eight patients with average 13.3% TBSA [range 2-58%] burn wounds were treated: 5 Caucasian and 3 African American with an average body mass index (BMI) of 26.8. Injury was due to predominantly flame burn, with additional injury from grease, scald, contact, friction and flash. Mean time between injury and AHSC treatment was 11 days [range 5-35 days]. All patients had adequate engraftment and complete epithelialization by the end of the study. Patients required one application of AHSC and no other additional surgical procedures at the application sites. The most common AEs for STSG-treated wounds included hypertrophic scarring and pruritus. One non-infected AHSC harvest site experienced a dehiscence. There were no other AEs related to AHSC treatment. AHSC treatment is feasible in deep partial and fullthickness burn wounds warranting additional investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33304208PMC7680199W3112939797What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.