Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33304183›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2020

Analysis of sugar composition and pesticides using HPLC and GC-MS techniques in honey samples collected from Saudi Arabian markets.

Budour A Alghamdi, Elham Shasho Alshumrani, Muneerah Saad Bin Saeed, Ghufran Mustafa Rawas, Norah Talal Alharthi, Mohammed Nabih Baeshen, Nawal Mohammed Helmi, Mohammad Zubair Alam, Mohd Suhail

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Current Trends of Food Analysis, Safety, and Packaging.International journal of food science · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Budour A AlghamdiDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Sciences, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Elham Shasho AlshumraniDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Sciences, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Muneerah Saad Bin SaeedDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Sciences, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ghufran Mustafa RawasDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Sciences, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Norah Talal AlharthiDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Sciences, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Nabih BaeshenDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Sciences, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Nawal Mohammed HelmiDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Sciences, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad Zubair AlamKing Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohd SuhailKing Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Honey is a complex foodstuff found in nature which is used without any processing. Honey has been in use in medicine as well as raw food since ancient times. Essentially, it is a blend of sugars especially fructose and glucose. The objectives of the study were to determine major sugar composition as well as pesticides contamination in honey samples. Further, Hydroxy-methyl-furfuraldehyde (HMF) level was also determined to ascertain the freshness of honey samples. A total of 14 samples were collected from local market and tested for fructose, glucose, sucrose, HMF and organochlorine pesticides using HPLC and GC-MS techniques respectively. The total sugars in the 14 honey samples were found ranging between 50.26 and 74.74 g/100 g of honey. The chromatographic results showed the presence of the sugars like fructose and glucose in all honey samples. The honey sample SH-11 was found to contain the highest amount of fructose (40.63%). On the other hand, the lowest amount of fructose with 29.08% was observed in SH-7. The HPLC analysis also revealed the presence of sucrose in two samples but under the permissible limit. The average ratio of fructose to glucose in these honey samples was 1.3. None of the sample has ratio below 1.0 indicating lesser chances for honey to crystallize on storage. Out of 14 honey samples, 13 samples were found negative for the presence of any of the 63 pesticides tested. Only sample No. 13, was found to contain 15.95 ppb hexachlorobenzene per kilogram of honey. The HMF was not detected in four samples but in remaining samples it was well below the maximum permissible limit. No pesticide and sugar adulteration was observed in any of the honey samples. The honeys collected from Saudi Arabian markets were found to confirm the standards set by the regional and international standardization organization, the GSO and Codex Alimentarius Commission respectively.

Indexed as

FructoseGlucoseHMFHoneyPesticidesSugars

Identifiers

PMID33304183
PMCPMC7714983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.