Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33303992›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2021

Gene therapy using haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.

Giuliana Ferrari, Adrian J Thrasher, Alessandro Aiuti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 157 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
157citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

157 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 247 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Molecular and therapeutic frontiers in anemia therapy.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

97 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Giuliana FerrariVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Adrian J ThrasherMolecular and Cellular Immunology Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Alessandro AiutiVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. alessandro.aiuti@hsr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5398-1717
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of HealthWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) gene therapy has emerged as an effective treatment modality for monogenic disorders of the blood system such as primary immunodeficiencies and β-thalassaemia. Medicinal products based on autologous HSPCs corrected using lentiviral and gammaretroviral vectors have now been approved for clinical use, and the site-specific genome modification of HSPCs using gene editing techniques such as CRISPR-Cas9 has shown great clinical promise. Preclinical studies have shown engineered HSPCs could also be used to cross-correct non-haematopoietic cells in neurodegenerative metabolic diseases. Here, we review the most recent advances in HSPC gene therapy and discuss emerging strategies for using HSPC gene therapy for a range of diseases.

Indexed as

Genetic Therapybeta-ThalassemiaCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingHematopoietic Stem CellsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansPrimary Immunodeficiency Diseases

Identifiers

PMID33303992
OpenAlexW3112955933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.