ArticleScientific reports2020
A promising approach in laser vitrectomy executed by plasma-mediated removal of vitreous body via a diode-pumped Q-switched Nd:YAG laser.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To examine the applicability of plasma-mediated vitreous body removal, a diode-pumped Q-switched Neodymium:YAG laser was used for a possible application in eye surgery/vitrectomy. On a total of 1500 porcine vitreous bodies, removal rates were evaluated by comparing different LaserVit-tip designs (Mark I/II Gauge 19 and Mark III Gauge 22). The Nd:YAG laser, operating at a wavelength of 1064 nm and a pulse duration of 4 ns, was utilized for vitreous body removal with respective settings of 2, 3 and 4 mJ and pulse repetition rates (cut rates) from 5 to 25 Hz (300-1500 /min) in 5 Hz-steps as well as for 100 Hz (6000 cuts/min). The exposure times were selected at 10, 20, 40 and 60 s, respectively. Comparative measurements were carried out with mechanical cutters (Gauge 20 and Gauge 23), applying a fixed cut rate of 800 /min (13.33 Hz) at identical exposure times. The LaserVit-tips showed successful vitreous body removal for all laser settings and exposure times (Mark I: 6.2 g/min, Mark II: 8.2 g/min at 1500 cuts/min and 3 mJ, Mark II: 10.1 g/min, Mark III: 3.6 g/min at 6000 cuts/min at 3 mJ). Similar tip-dimensions (Gauge 22
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.