Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33303942›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Processing of pragmatic communication in ASD: a video-based brain imaging study.

Aija Kotila, Aapo Hyvärinen, Leena Mäkinen, Eeva Leinonen, Tuula Hurtig, Hanna Ebeling, Vesa Korhonen, Vesa J Kiviniemi, Soile Loukusa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Role of the Brain's Pragmatic Language Network in Reading Comprehension in Autistic Children.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aija KotilaResearch Unit of Logopedics, Faculty of Humanities, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. aija.kotila@oulu.fi.ORCID 0000-0003-4631-9239
Aapo HyvärinenDepartment of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Leena MäkinenResearch Unit of Logopedics, Faculty of Humanities, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Eeva LeinonenOffice of the Vice Chancellor, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.
Tuula HurtigResearch Unit of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychiatry, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Hanna EbelingPEDEGO Research Unit, The Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Vesa KorhonenDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Medical Research Center (MRC), University and University Hospital of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Vesa J KiviniemiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Medical Research Center (MRC), University and University Hospital of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Soile LoukusaResearch Unit of Logopedics, Faculty of Humanities, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social and pragmatic difficulties in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are widely recognized, although their underlying neural level processing is not well understood. The aim of this study was to examine the activity of the brain network components linked to social and pragmatic understanding in order to reveal whether complex socio-pragmatic events evoke differences in brain activity between the ASD and control groups. Nineteen young adults (mean age 23.6 years) with ASD and 19 controls (mean age 22.7 years) were recruited for the study. The stimulus data consisted of video clips showing complex social events that demanded processing of pragmatic communication. In the analysis, the functional magnetic resonance imaging signal responses of the selected brain network components linked to social and pragmatic information processing were compared. Although the processing of the young adults with ASD was similar to that of the control group during the majority of the social scenes, differences between the groups were found in the activity of the social brain network components when the participants were observing situations with concurrent verbal and non-verbal communication events. The results suggest that the ASD group had challenges in processing concurrent multimodal cues in complex pragmatic communication situations.

Indexed as

CommunicationCuesAdultAutism Spectrum DisorderBrainFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleVerbal BehaviorYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33303942
PMCPMC7729953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.