Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33303871›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Dietary fiber components, microstructure, and texture of date fruits (Phoenix dactylifera, L.).

Afaf Kamal-Eldin, Navomy George, Bhawna Sobti, Nouf AlRashidi, Sami Ghnimi, Abdul Aziz Ali, Annica A M Andersson, Roger Andersson, Asha Antony, Fathalla Hamed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prolonged On-Vine vs. Cold ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Afaf Kamal-EldinDepartment of Food, Nutrition, and Health, College of Food and Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, 15551, UAE. afaf.kamal@uaeu.ac.ae.
Navomy GeorgeDepartment of Food, Nutrition, and Health, College of Food and Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, 15551, UAE.
Bhawna SobtiDepartment of Food, Nutrition, and Health, College of Food and Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, 15551, UAE.
Nouf AlRashidiDepartment of Food, Nutrition, and Health, College of Food and Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, 15551, UAE.
Sami GhnimiUniversity of Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, LAGEPP UMR 5007, 43 Bd 11 Novembre 1918, 69622, Villeurbanne, France.
Abdul Aziz AliDepartment of Economics and Statistics, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
Annica A M AnderssonDepartment of Molecular Sciences, BioCentre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O Box 7015, 75007, Uppsala, SE, Sweden.
Roger AnderssonDepartment of Molecular Sciences, BioCentre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O Box 7015, 75007, Uppsala, SE, Sweden.
Asha AntonyDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Food and Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE.
Fathalla HamedDepartment of Physics, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Date fruits vary widely in the hardness of their edible parts and they are classified accordingly into soft, semi-dry, and dry varieties. Fruit texture, a significant parameter in determining consumer acceptance, is related to the tissue structure and chemical composition of the fruit, mainly the ratio of sucrose to reducing sugars. This study aimed to understand the relationship between the chemical composition, microstructure, and texture profile of 10 major Emirati date fruits. The soluble sugars, glucose and fructose, represent ca 80 g/100 g of the fruits on the basis of dry weight (DW) while the dietary fiber contents varied 5.2-7.4 g/100 dg D.W. with lignin being the main determinant of the variability. The textures of the samples were studied using instrumental texture profile analysis. While no correlation was found between the soluble sugar and texture parameters in this study, the different fiber constituents correlated variably with the different parameters of date fruit texture. Lignin, arabinoxylan, galactomannan, and pectin were found to correlate significantly with fruit hardness and the related parameters, gumminess and chewiness. Both lignin and arabinoxylan correlated with resilience, and arabinoxylan exhibited a strong correlation with cohesiveness.

Indexed as

HardnessDietary FiberFructoseGalactoseGlucoseLigninMannansMicroscopyPectinsPhoeniceaeSucroseXylansarabinoxylanDietary FiberFructosegalactomannanGalactoseGlucoseLigninMannansPectinsSucroseXylans

Identifiers

PMID33303871
PMCPMC7728813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.