ArticleScientific reports2020
Large genotype-phenotype study in carriers of D4Z4 borderline alleles provides guidance for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy diagnosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autoimmune Comorbidities as Modifiers of Phenotypic Heterogeneity in Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- Nanopore Ultra-Long Sequencing for FSHD: From Molecular Diagnosis to Preimplantation Genetic Testing.Genes · 2026Review
- Co-Occurrence of Myasthenia Gravis and Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy: A Case Series and Review of Literature.European journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Observational
- Genome-wide analysis of FSHD cell lines using Nanopore sequencing reveals allele-specific differences at DUX4 target genes and complex repeats.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Camptocormia as a Phenotypic Variant of FSHD in the Elderly: Clinical, Genetic, and Imaging Features.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Prevalence and predictors of uncommon features in FSHD1 patients: insights from the French FSHD registry.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Describing phenotypes in FSHD: an update of the comprehensive clinical evaluation form.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Double trouble: a comprehensive study into unrelated genetic comorbidities in adult patients with Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy Type I.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- Nucleolar FRG2 lncRNAs inhibit rRNA transcription and cytoplasmic translation, linking FSHD to dysregulation of muscle-specific protein synthesis.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Deciphering Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy in the clinical trials era: where are we now?Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2025Review
- AChR-seropositive myasthenia gravis in muscular dystrophy: diagnostic pitfalls and clinical management challenges.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Review
- French National Protocol for diagnosis and care of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD).Journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Physical activity practiced at a young age is associated with a less severe subsequent clinical presentation in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Whole exome sequencing highlights rare variants inFrontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Article
- Counseling and prenatal diagnosis in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: A retrospective study on a 13-year multidisciplinary approach.Health science reports · 2022Article
- Orofacial Manifestations Associated with Muscular Dystrophies: A Review.Turkish journal of orthodontics · 2022Article
- Defining and identifying satellite cell-opathies within muscular dystrophies and myopathies.Experimental cell research · 2022Article
- Orofacial Muscle Weakening in Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSHD) Patients.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors at 17 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a myopathy with prevalence of 1 in 20,000. Almost all patients affected by FSHD carry deletions of an integral number of tandem 3.3 kilobase repeats, termed D4Z4, located on chromosome 4q35. Assessment of size of D4Z4 alleles is commonly used for FSHD diagnosis. However, the extended molecular testing has expanded the spectrum of clinical phenotypes. In particular, D4Z4 alleles with 9-10 repeat have been found in healthy individuals, in subjects with FSHD or affected by other myopathies. These findings weakened the strict relationship between observed phenotypes and their underlying genotypes, complicating the interpretation of molecular findings for diagnosis and genetic counseling. In light of the wide clinical variability detected in carriers of D4Z4 alleles with 9-10 repeats, we applied a standardized methodology, the Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation Form (CCEF), to describe and characterize the phenotype of 244 individuals carrying D4Z4 alleles with 9-10 repeats (134 index cases and 110 relatives). The study shows that 54.5% of index cases display a classical FSHD phenotype with typical facial and scapular muscle weakness, whereas 20.1% present incomplete phenotype with facial weakness or scapular girdle weakness, 6.7% display minor signs such as winged scapula or hyperCKemia, without functional motor impairment, and 18.7% of index cases show more complex phenotypes with atypical clinical features. Family studies revealed that 70.9% of relatives carrying 9-10 D4Z4 reduced alleles has no motor impairment, whereas a few relatives (10.0%) display a classical FSHD phenotype. Importantly all relatives of index cases with no FSHD phenotype were healthy carriers. These data establish the low penetrance of D4Z4 alleles with 9-10 repeats. We recommend the use of CCEF for the standardized clinical assessment integrated by family studies and further molecular investigation for appropriate diagnosis and genetic counseling. Especially in presence of atypical phenotypes and/or sporadic cases with all healthy relatives is not possible to perform conclusive diagnosis of FSHD, but all these cases need further studies for a proper diagnosis, to search novel causative genetic defects or investigate environmental factors or co-morbidities that may trigger the pathogenic process. These evidences are also fundamental for the stratification of patients eligible for clinical trials. Our work reinforces the value of large genotype-phenotype studies to define criteria for clinical practice and genetic counseling in rare diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.