ArticleScientific reports2020
Amino acid torsion angles enable prediction of protein fold classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- PCIPG2.0: multi-omics fusion and structure-aware graph autoencoding for protein complex identification.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Underlying effect of SMAD4 gene polymorphism on risk prediction of papillary thyroid carcinoma in Chinese population.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Missense variants in CYP4B1 associated with increased risk of lung cancer among Chinese Han population.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- SAINT-Angle: self-attention augmented inception-inside-inception network and transfer learning improve protein backbone torsion angle prediction.Bioinformatics advances · 2023Article
- Missense Variant rs28362680 inPharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Data Mining of Molecular Simulations Suggest Key Amino Acid Residues for Aggregation, Signaling and Drug Action.Biomolecules · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein structure can provide insights that help biologists to predict and understand protein functions and interactions. However, the number of known protein structures has not kept pace with the number of protein sequences determined by high-throughput sequencing. Current techniques used to determine the structure of proteins are complex and require a lot of time to analyze the experimental results, especially for large protein molecules. The limitations of these methods have motivated us to create a new approach for protein structure prediction. Here we describe a new approach to predict of protein structures and structure classes from amino acid sequences. Our prediction model performs well in comparison with previous methods when applied to the structural classification of two CATH datasets with more than 5000 protein domains. The average accuracy is 92.5% for structure classification, which is higher than that of previous research. We also used our model to predict four known protein structures with a single amino acid sequence, while many other existing methods could only obtain one possible structure for a given sequence. The results show that our method provides a new effective and reliable tool for protein structure prediction research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.