Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33303790›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Ravens parallel great apes in physical and social cognitive skills.

Simone Pika, Miriam Jennifer Sima, Christian R Blum, Esther Herrmann, Roger Mundry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Conscious birds.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Why birds are smart.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Human and chimpanzee shared and divergent neurobiological systems for general and specific cognitive brain functions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Autism attenuates the perception of the mind-body divide.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Hooded Crows (Frontiers in psychology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simone PikaComparative BioCognition, Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Artilleriestrasse 34, 49076, Osnabrück, Germany. spika@uos.de.
Miriam Jennifer SimaResearch Group "Evolution of Communication", Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.
Christian R BlumResearch Group "Evolution of Communication", Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.
Esther HerrmannResearch Group "Human Origins of Self-Regulation", Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Roger MundryInterim Group Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human children show unique cognitive skills for dealing with the social world but their cognitive performance is paralleled by great apes in many tasks dealing with the physical world. Recent studies suggested that members of a songbird family-corvids-also evolved complex cognitive skills but a detailed understanding of the full scope of their cognition was, until now, not existent. Furthermore, relatively little is known about their cognitive development. Here, we conducted the first systematic, quantitative large-scale assessment of physical and social cognitive performance of common ravens with a special focus on development. To do so, we fine-tuned one of the most comprehensive experimental test-batteries, the Primate Cognition Test Battery (PCTB), to raven features enabling also a direct, quantitative comparison with the cognitive performance of two great ape species. Full-blown cognitive skills were already present at the age of four months with subadult ravens' cognitive performance appearing very similar to that of adult apes in tasks of physical (quantities, and causality) and social cognition (social learning, communication, and theory of mind). These unprecedented findings strengthen recent assessments of ravens' general intelligence, and aid to the growing evidence that the lack of a specific cortical architecture does not hinder advanced cognitive skills. Difficulties in certain cognitive scales further emphasize the quest to develop comparative test batteries that tap into true species rather than human specific cognitive skills, and suggest that socialization of test individuals may play a crucial role. We conclude to pay more attention to the impact of personality on cognitive output, and a currently neglected topic in Animal Cognition-the linkage between ontogeny and cognitive performance.

Indexed as

CognitionIntelligencePsychomotor PerformanceSocial SkillsAnimalsCrowsFemaleMalePan troglodytesPongo

Identifiers

PMID33303790
PMCPMC7728792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.