Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33303729›Full record

ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020

Preoperative Intranasal Decolonization with Topical Povidone-Iodine Antiseptic and the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection: A Review.

Vidmi Taolam Martin, Mohamed Abdullahi Abdi, Jie Li, Dongtai Li, Zhaozhen Wang, Xianliao Zhang, Welera Haissou Elodie, Bo Yu

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vidmi Taolam MartinDepartment of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Mohamed Abdullahi AbdiDepartment of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Jie LiDepartment of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Dongtai LiDepartment of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Zhaozhen WangDepartment of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Xianliao ZhangDepartment of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Welera Haissou ElodieDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Bo YuDepartment of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Southern Medical University · CNZhujiang Hospital · CNNanfang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical site infection (SSI) occurs at the incisional site of a surgical procedure and usually involves the skin. The use of antibacterial courses to manage SSIs is still very challenging in clinical settings. When not used appropriately, antibacterial agents can lead to increased rates of adverse events. However, various antibacterial agents that can destroy the growth of bacteria are now available. This article aims to discuss the role of preoperative intranasal decolonization with topical povidone-iodine antiseptic in the incidence of SSI based on a review of the literature. Topical bactericidal agents can be administered intranasally before surgery to eliminate potentially harmful bacteria, including antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria. Therefore, a few studies have recommended the use of intranasal povidone-iodine solution in the clinical setting; however, it also appears to be a promising antiseptic regimen for preoperative decontamination in patients planned to undergo surgery. Povidone-iodine is a commonly used medical antiseptic agent that is used by surgeons to promote wound healing and prevent postoperative bacterial infections. Chlorhexidine gluconate is both an antiseptic and a disinfectant, which is used to clean the skin and surgical instruments. Our review of the literature on studies on the effectiveness of intranasal povidone-iodine in the reduction of intranasal bacterial colonization and the prevention of SSI identified only 5 controlled clinical studies. One study, however, showed increased effectiveness in preventing SSI when topical intranasal povidone-iodine was combined with the use of chlorhexidine gluconate washcloths. Further large-scale controlled clinical studies are needed before proper guidelines can be made.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisAdministration, IntranasalAdministration, TopicalAnti-Infective Agents, LocalHumansIncidencePovidone-IodineSurgical Wound InfectionAnti-Infective Agents, LocalPovidone-Iodine

Identifiers

PMID33303729
PMCPMC7737406
OpenAlexW3111184582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.