Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33303644›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2021

Understanding Racial Disparities in Gastrointestinal Cancer Outcomes: Lack of Surgery Contributes to Lower Survival in African American Patients.

John N Bliton, Michael Parides, Peter Muscarella, Katia T Papalezova, Haejin In

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John N BlitonDepartment of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Michael ParidesDepartment of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Peter MuscarellaDepartment of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-1448-5507
Katia T PapalezovaDepartment of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-6167-0855
Haejin InDepartment of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York. hin@montefiore.org.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

Montefiore Academic Community NCORP ProgramUG1CA189859 · NCI · MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER (BRONX, NY) · PI Balazs Halmos, Della Makower · 2014 to 2026
$10.8M
Paul Calabresis Career Development Award For Clinical Oncology K12CA132783 · NCI · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI PEREZ-SOLER, ROMAN, VERMA, AMIT K. · 2009 to 2019
$8.2M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA132783NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRace/ethnicity-related differences in rates of cancer surgery and cancer mortality have been observed for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. This study aims to estimate the extent to which differences in receipt of surgery explain racial/ethnic disparities in cancer survival.

methodsThe National Cancer Database was used to obtain data for patients diagnosed with stage I-III mid-esophageal, distal esophagus/gastric cardia (DEGC), noncardia gastric, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer in years 2004-2015. Mediation analysis was used to identify variables influencing the relationship between race/ethnicity and mortality, including surgery.

resultsA total of 600,063 patients were included in the study: 3.5% mid-esophageal, 12.4% DEGC, 4.9% noncardia gastric, 17.0% pancreatic, 40.1% colon, and 22.0% rectal cancers. The operative rates for Black patients were low relative to White patients, with absolute differences of 21.0%, 19.9%, 2.3%, 8.3%, 1.6%, and 7.7%. Adjustment for age, stage, and comorbidities revealed even lower odds of receiving surgery for Black patients compared with White patients. The observed HRs for Black patients compared with White patients ranged from 1.01 to 1.42. Mediation analysis showed that receipt of surgery and socioeconomic factors had greatest influence on the survival disparity.

conclusionsThe results of this study indicate that Black patients appear to be undertreated compared with White patients for GI cancers. The disproportionately low operative rates contribute to the known survival disparity between Black and White patients. IMPACT: Interventions to reduce barriers to surgery for Black patients should be promoted to reduce disparities in GI cancer outcomes.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanGastrointestinal NeoplasmsEthnicityHumansSocioeconomic FactorsWhite People

Identifiers

PMID33303644
PMCPMC8049948
OpenAlexW3112114706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.