ArticleGenome research2021
Evidence of widespread, independent sequence signature for transcription factor cobinding.
Article in Genome research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of transcription factor co-binding patterns with non-negative matrix factorization.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Asymmetric Predictive Relationships Across Histone Modifications.Nature machine intelligence · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcription factors (TFs) are the vocabulary that genomes use to regulate gene expression and phenotypes. The interactions among TFs enrich this vocabulary and orchestrate diverse biological processes. Although simple models identify open chromatin and the presence of TF motifs as the two major contributors to TF binding patterns, it remains elusive what contributes to the in vivo TF cobinding landscape. In this study, we developed a machine learning algorithm to explore the contributors of the cobinding patterns. The algorithm substantially outperforms the state-of-the-field models for TF cobinding prediction. Game theory-based feature importance analysis reveals that, for most of the TF pairs we studied, independent motif sequences contribute one or more of the two TFs under investigation to their cobinding patterns. Such independent motif sequences include, but are not limited to, transcription initiation-related proteins and known TF complexes. We found the motif sequence signatures and the TFs are rarely mutual, corroborating a hierarchical and directional organization of the regulatory network and refuting the possibility of artifacts caused by shared sequence similarity with the TFs under investigation. We modeled such regulatory language with directed graphs, which reveal shared, global factors that are related to many binding and cobinding patterns.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.