Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33303470›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Birth experience during COVID-19 confinement (CONFINE): protocol for a multicentre prospective study.

Charline Bertholdt, Jonathan Epstein, Claire Banasiak, Fabienne Ligier, Sandra Dahlhoff, Marie France Olieric, Nicolas Mottet, Marine Beaumont, Olivier Morel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04348929 (Birth Experience During COVID-19 Confinement), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04348929 nacompletednot on this map

Birth Experience During COVID-19 Confinement (Confinement and Fostering Intrapartum Care)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentral Hospital, Nancy, FranceRan2020 to 2023Enrolled927ConditionsPostpartum DepressionArmsSelf-administered questionnaires
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Charline BertholdtGynecology-Obstetric center, University of Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, France charline.bertholdt@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9297-5363
Jonathan EpsteinInserm, CIC Epidémiologie Clinique, CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, France.
Claire BanasiakInserm, CIC Innovation Technologique, CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, France.
Fabienne LigierPUPEA, Nancy Psychotherapy Center-EA 4360 APEMAC, MICS team, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Sandra DahlhoffObstetric Gynecology, CHR Metz-Thionville, Metz Mother and Child Hospital, Peltre, France.
Marie France OliericObstetric Gynecology, CHR Metz-Thionville, Bel-Air Hospital, Thionville, France.
Nicolas MottetObstetric Gynecology, CHU Besançon Jean-Minjoz Hospital, Besancon, France.
Marine BeaumontInserm, CIC Innovation Technologique, CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, France.
Olivier MorelGynecology-Obstetric center, University of Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, France.
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional de Metz-Thionville · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FRInterdisciplinarité en Santé Publique Interventions et Instruments de mesure complexes – Région Est · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe absence of companionship during childbirth is known to be responsible for negative emotional birth experience, which can increase the risk of postpartum depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. The context of COVID-19 epidemic and the related confinement could increase the rate of negative experience and mental disorders. The main objective is to compare, in immediate post partum, the maternal sense of control during childbirth between a group of women who gave birth during confinement ('confinement' group) versus a group of women who gave birth after confinement but in the context of epidemic ('epidemic' group) versus a group of control women ('control' group; excluding confinement and epidemic context). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a national multicentre prospective cohort study conducted in four French maternity units. We expect to include 927 women in a period of 16 months. Women will be recruited immediately in post partum during three different periods constituting the three groups: 'confinement'; 'epidemic' and 'control' group. The maternal sense of control will be evaluated by the Labour Agentry Scale questionnaire completed immediately in post partum. Postnatal depression (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale), post-traumatic stress disorder (Impact of Event Scale-Revised) and breast feeding (evaluative statement) will be evaluated at 2 months post partum. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the French Ethics Committee, the CPP (Comité de Protection des Personnes) SUD OUEST ET OUTRE-MER IV on 16th of April 2020 with reference number CPP2020-04-040. The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at relevant conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04348929.

Indexed as

Physical DistancingCOVID-19Depression, PostpartumFemaleFranceHumansParturitionPostpartum PeriodPregnancyProspective StudiesPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesResearch DesignStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticSurveys and QuestionnairesTime Factorsadult psychiatrydepression & mood disordersmaternal medicine

Identifiers

PMID33303470
PMCPMC7733205
OpenAlexW3110746664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.