Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33303448›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Worried, weary and worn out: mixed-method study of stress and well-being in final-year medical students.

Abbie Lane, Jack McGrath, Eimear Cleary, Allys Guerandel, Kevin M Malone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Procrastination in medical students: a systematic review.Canadian medical education journal · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The impact of affective and cognitive empathy on stress in medical students.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Abbie LaneDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health Research, St. Vincent's University Hospital and School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland abbielane0@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6860-4586
Jack McGrathCardiff University School of Medicine, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Eimear ClearyDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health Research, St. Vincent's University Hospital and School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Allys GuerandelDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health Research, St. Vincent's University Hospital and School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Kevin M MaloneDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health Research, St. Vincent's University Hospital and School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
University College Dublin · IECardiff University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough there is much focus on burnout and psychological distress among doctors, studies about stress and well-being in medical students are limited but could inform early intervention and prevention strategies.

designThe primary aim of this mixed-method, cross-sectional survey was to compare objective and subjective levels of stress in final-year medical students (2017) and to explore their perspectives on the factors they considered relevant to their well-being.

settingUniversity College Dublin, the largest university in Ireland.

participants161 of 235 medical students participated in this study (response rate 69%).

results65.2% of students scored over accepted norms for the Perceived Stress Scale (34.8% low, 55.9% moderate and 9.3% high). 35% scored low, 28.7% moderate and 36.3% high on the Subjective Stress Scale. Thematic analysis identified worry about exams, relationships, concern about the future, work-life balance and finance; one in three students reported worry, irritability and hostility; many felt worn out. Cognitive impacts included overthinking, poor concentration, sense of failure, hopelessness and procrastination. Almost a third reported sleep and appetite disturbance, fatigue and weariness. A quarter reported a 'positive reaction' to stress. Positive strategies to manage stress included connection and talking, exercise, non-study activity and meditation. Unhelpful strategies included isolation and substance use. No student reported using the college support services or sought professional help.

conclusionMedical students experience high levels of psychological distress, similar to their more senior doctor colleagues. They are disinclined to avail of traditional college help services. Toxic effects of stress may impact their cognition, learning, engagement and empathy and may increase patient risk and adverse outcomes. The focus of well-being in doctors should be extended upstream and embedded in the curriculum where it could prevent future burnout, improve retention to the profession and deliver better outcomes for patients.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalStudents, MedicalAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIrelandStress, Psychologicalmedical education & trainingmental healthoccupational & industrial medicinequalitative researchrisk management

Identifiers

PMID33303448
PMCPMC7733191
OpenAlexW3113083868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.