Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33303447›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Protocol for an implementation and realist evaluation of a new organisational model for primary care practices in the canton of Vaud, Switzerland.

Muriel Schutz Leuthold, Joelle Schwarz, Joachim Marti, Clémence Perraudin, Catherine Hudon, Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux, Nicolas Senn, Christine Cohidon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muriel Schutz LeutholdDépartement Médecine de famille, Centre Universitaire de Médecine Générale et Santé Publique, Lausanne, Switzerland muriel.schutz@unisante.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-8303-5126
Joelle SchwarzDépartement Médecine de famille, Centre Universitaire de Médecine Générale et Santé Publique, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Joachim MartiDépartement Epidémiologie et Systèmes de santé, Centre Universitaire de Médecine Générale et Santé Publique, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Clémence PerraudinDépartement des Policliniques, Centre Universitaire de Médecine Générale et Santé Publique, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Catherine HudonDépartement de Médecine de Famille et Médecine d'Urgence, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6140-9916
Isabelle Peytremann-BridevauxDépartement Epidémiologie et Systèmes de santé, Centre Universitaire de Médecine Générale et Santé Publique, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6514-8781
Nicolas SennDépartement Médecine de famille, Centre Universitaire de Médecine Générale et Santé Publique, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Christine CohidonDépartement Médecine de famille, Centre Universitaire de Médecine Générale et Santé Publique, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionContinuity of care, especially for patients with complex needs, is a major challenge for healthcare systems in many high-income countries, including Switzerland. Since 2015, a collaborative project between Unisanté-Department of Family Medicine (DMF), some general practitioners (GPs) and canton of Vaud's public health authorities has sought to develop a new organisational model for the provision of primary care to ensure better care coordination and to provide adapted care deliveries to patients' healthcare needs. The model's main component is the addition of a primary care nurse to GPs practices. Three additional tools are individualised patient care plans, electronic medical records and patient empanelment. To assess this model, a 2-year pilot study has begun in nine GPs' practices in the canton. This paper presents the protocol for an evaluation of the implementation and effectiveness of the new organisational model. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a before-and-after study using a mixed-methods and a realist approach. First, we will use quantitative and qualitative data to assess the new organisational model's implementation (feasibility, fidelity, acceptability and costs) and effectiveness (healthcare services use, patient experience, staff experience and patient-level costs). Combining this data with focus group data will enable a realist evaluation of the pilot project, which will help understand the elements of context and mechanism that affect implementation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The evaluation will inform the canton of Vaud's health authorities about the limits of and perspectives for this organisational model. All results will also be made available to the practices and the patients involved. At the end of the project, we will propose organisational adaptations and a sustainable financial model for extending the model to other practices in the canton and potentially to the national level.The canton of Vaud's Human Research Ethics Committee approved the study, and Data Protection and Information Law Authority gave a favourable opinion concerning data processing procedures.

Indexed as

General PractitionersModels, OrganizationalHumansPilot ProjectsPrimary Health CareSwitzerlandgeneral medicine (see Internal Medicine)organisation of health servicesprimary care

Identifiers

PMID33303447
PMCPMC7733189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.