Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33303431›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Patient and provider perspectives on barriers to screening for diabetic retinopathy: an exploratory study from southern India.

Shuba Kumar, Geetha Kumar, Saranya Velu, Shahina Pardhan, Sobha Sivaprasad, Paisan Ruamviboonsuk, Rajiv Raman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Barriers and Enablers to Seeking Eye Care Among the Adult Indian Population: A Systematic Review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Shuba KumarSamarth, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Geetha KumarShri Bhagwan Mahavir Vitreoretinal Services, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India.
Saranya VeluShri Bhagwan Mahavir Vitreoretinal Services, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India.
Shahina PardhanVision and Eye Research Unit (VERU), School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Sobha SivaprasadNIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Paisan RuamviboonsukDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rajiv RamanShri Bhagwan Mahavir Vitreoretinal Services, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India rajivpgraman@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5842-0233
Sankara Nethralaya · INAnglia Ruskin University · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBRajavithi Hospital · THSwarnabhoomi Academy of Music · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDiabetic retinopathy is one of the leading causes of visual impairment after cataract and uncorrected refractive error. It has major public health implications globally, especially in countries such as India where the prevalence of diabetes is high. With timely screening and intervention, the disease progression to blindness can be prevented, but several barriers exist. As compliance to diabetic retinopathy screening in people with diabetes is very poor in India, this study was conducted to explore understanding of and barriers to diabetic retinopathy screening from the perspectives of patients and healthcare providers.

methodsUsing qualitative methods, 15 consenting adult patients with diabetes were selected purposively from those attending a large tertiary care private eye hospital in southern India. Eight semistructured interviews were carried out with healthcare providers working in large private hospitals. All interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the framework analytical approach.

resultsFour themes that best explained the data were recognising and living with diabetes, care-seeking practices, awareness about diabetic retinopathy and barriers to diabetic retinopathy screening. Findings showed that patients were aware of diabetes but understanding of diabetic retinopathy and its complications was poor. Absence of symptoms, difficulties in doctor-patient interactions and tedious nature of follow-up care were some major deterrents to care seeking reported by patients. Difficulties in communicating information about diabetic retinopathy to less literate patients, heavy work pressure and silent progression of the disease were major barriers to patients coming for follow-up care as reported by healthcare providers.

conclusionsEnhancing patient understanding through friendly doctor-patient interactions will promote trust in the doctor. The use of an integrated treatment approach including education by counsellors, setting up of patient support groups, telescreening approaches and use of conversation maps may prove more effective in the long run.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyAdultHealth PersonnelHumansIndiaMass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health Carediabetic retinopathygeneral diabetespublic health

Identifiers

PMID33303431
PMCPMC7733174
OpenAlexW3111302819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.