Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33302996›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2020

Recovery of preoperative absolute knee extension and flexion strength after ACL reconstruction.

Ramana Piussi, Daniel Broman, Erik Musslinder, Susanne Beischer, Roland Thomeé, Eric Hamrin Senorski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Persistent isokinetic knee flexion strength deficits at the time of return to sport are not associated with a second ACL injury.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ramana PiussiSportrehab Sports Medicine Clinic, Stampgatan 14, SE-411 01, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Daniel BromanSportrehab Sports Medicine Clinic, Stampgatan 14, SE-411 01, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Erik MusslinderSportrehab Sports Medicine Clinic, Stampgatan 14, SE-411 01, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Susanne BeischerSportrehab Sports Medicine Clinic, Stampgatan 14, SE-411 01, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Roland ThomeéSportrehab Sports Medicine Clinic, Stampgatan 14, SE-411 01, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Eric Hamrin SenorskiSportrehab Sports Medicine Clinic, Stampgatan 14, SE-411 01, Gothenburg, Sweden. eric.hamrin.senorski@gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9340-0147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe recovery of muscle function after an Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction is most commonly reported as limb-to-limb differences using the Limb Symmetry Index (LSI), which is not free from limitations. The purpose of this study was to compare the proportion of patients who recover their Preoperative Absolute Muscle Strength (PAMS) 8 and 12 months after ACL reconstruction with the proportion of patients who recover their symmetrical knee strength. A secondary aim was to assess the relationship between psychological Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and recovering PAMS at 8 and 12 months after ACL reconstruction and rehabilitation.

methodPreoperative, 8- and 12-month results from quadriceps and hamstring strength tests and PROs for 117 patients were extracted from a rehabilitation registry. Individual preoperative peak torques from strength tests were compared with results from the 8- and 12-month follow-ups respectively. Patients were defined as having recovered their PAMS upon reaching 90% of their preoperative peak torque for both quadriceps and hamstring strength. Patients were defined as having recovered their LSI upon reaching a value ≥90% when comparing the results for their injured knee with those of their healthy knee. Correlations between the recovery of PAMS and PROs at 8 and 12 months were analyzed.

resultsThere was no difference in the proportion of patients who recovered their PAMS compared with patients who recovered their LSI. In all, 30% and 32% of the patients who recovered their LSI had not recovered their PAMS at 8 months and 12 months respectively. In the patients who had recovered their PAMS, 24% and 31% had not recovered their symmetrical LSI at 8 months and 12 months respectively. There was no significant correlation between the recovery of PAMS and psychological PROs.

conclusionThe use of both PAMS and LSI provides more detailed information on the recovery of muscle strength after ACL reconstruction. The recovery of PAMS was not correlated with psychological traits, which implies that both PROs and PAMS are important when evaluating patients after ACL reconstruction.

trial registrationThis trial was not registered.

Indexed as

Anterior cruciate ligamentEvaluationKneeLimb symmetry index

Identifiers

PMID33302996
PMCPMC7727173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.