Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33302978›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2020

Different impacts of the zero-markup drug policy on county general and traditional Chinese medicine hospitals: evidence from Shandong province, China.

Xiaofeng Jiang, Ping He, Dawei Zhu, Xuefeng Shi, Qingyue Meng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaofeng JiangCenter for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, No. 44 Wen Hua Xi Lu, Lixia District, Jinan, 250012, China.
Ping HeChina Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Dawei ZhuChina Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Xuefeng ShiSchool of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 11, Bei San Huan Dong Lu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.
Qingyue MengChina Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China. qmeng@bjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs a key part of the new round of health reform, the zero-markup drug policy (ZMDP) removed the profit margins of drug sales at public health care facilities, and had some effects to the operation of these institutions. This study aims to assess whether the ZMDP has different impacts between county general and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) hospitals.

methodsWe obtained longitudinal data from all county general and TCM hospitals of Shandong province in 2007-2017. We used difference-in-difference (DID) method to identify the overall and dynamic effects of the ZMDP.

resultsOn average, after the implementation of the ZMDP, the share of revenue from medicine sales reduced by 16.47 and 10.42%, the revenue from medicine sales reduced by 24.04 and 11.58%, in county general and TCM hospitals, respectively. The gross revenue reduced by 5.07% in county general hospitals. The number of annual outpatient visits reduced by 11.22% in county TCM hospitals. Government subsidies increased by 199.22 and 89.3% in county general and TCM hospitals, respectively. The ZMDP reform was not significantly associated with the revenue and expenditure surplus, the number of annual outpatient visits and the number of annual inpatient visits in county general hospitals, the gross revenue, the revenue and expenditure surplus and the number of annual inpatient visits in county TCM hospitals. In terms of dynamic effects, the share of revenue from medicine sales, revenue from medicine sales, and gross revenue decreased by 20.20, 32.58 and 6.08% respectively, and up to 28.53, 63.89 and 17.94% after adoption, while government subsidies increased by around 170 to 200% in county general hospitals. The number of annual outpatient visits decreased by 9.70% and up to 18.84% in county TCM hospitals.

conclusionThe ZMDP achieved its some initial goals of removing the profits from western medicines in county hospitals' revenue without disrupting the normal operation, and had different impacts between county general and TCM hospitals. Meanwhile, some unintended consequences were also recognized through the analysis, such as the decline of the utilization of the TCM.

Indexed as

Health PolicyChinaCost ControlDrug CostsFinancing, GovernmentHospitals, CountyHumansLongitudinal StudiesMedicine, Chinese TraditionalCounty general hospitalsCounty traditional Chinese medicine hospitalsDifference-in-differenceDynamic effectsZero-markup drug policy

Identifiers

PMID33302978
PMCPMC7726895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.