ArticleRespiratory research2020
Monitoring of noninvasive ventilation: comparative analysis of different strategies.
Article in Respiratory research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Beyond Teleconsultation: Exploring the Role of Mobile Health Technologies in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Prevalence and consequences of patient-ventilator interactions in a cohort of home-ventilated restrictive and neuromuscular patients: a multicentre study.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Transcutaneous COJournal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Utility and Outcome of Follow-Up Polysomnography in Patients With Ambulatory Noninvasive Ventilation.Pediatric pulmonology · 2025Article
- Review
- Home Noninvasive Ventilation in COPD.Chest · 2024Review
- The Use of Bi-Nasal Prongs for Delivery of Non-Invasive Ventilation to Foals.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Lowering PRespiratory care · 2023Article
- Practical Guide to Management of Long-Term Noninvasive Ventilation for Adults With Chronic Neuromuscular Disease.Respiratory care · 2023Review
- Getting It Right in Restrictive Lung Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- ERS International Congress 2022: highlights from the Respiratory Intensive Care Assembly.ERJ open research · 2023Review
- Pulmonary care for ALS: Progress, gaps, and paths forward.Muscle & nerve · 2023Review
- Monitoring Systems in Home Ventilation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Supraglottic jet oxygenation and ventilationFrontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Predicting hypercapnia and hypoxia by the ventilator's built-in software in children on long-term non-invasive ventilation: A pilot study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Ventilator integrated polygraphy for patients using non-invasive ventilation; Case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Monitoring Long Term Noninvasive Ventilation: Benefits, Caveats and Perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Effect of Respiratory Events on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Treated with Long-Term Noninvasive Ventilation.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2022Article
- Use of prototype bi-nasal prongs for noninvasive ventilation in foals.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNoninvasive ventilation (NIV) represents an effective treatment for chronic respiratory failure. However, empirically determined NIV settings may not achieve optimal ventilatory support. Therefore, the efficacy of NIV should be systematically monitored. The minimal recommended monitoring strategy includes clinical assessment, arterial blood gases (ABG) and nocturnal transcutaneous pulsed oxygen saturation (SpO
methodsThis retrospective comparative study evaluated the efficacy of NIV in consecutive patients through four strategies (A, B, C and D) using four different tools in various combinations. These tools included morning ABG, nocturnal SpO
resultsNIV was appropriate in only 29 of the 100 included patients. Strategy A considered 53 patients as appropriately ventilated. Strategy B considered 48 patients as appropriately ventilated. Strategy C misclassified only 6 patients with daytime hypercapnia.
conclusionMonitoring ABG and nocturnal SpO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.