Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33302920›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

"An unnecessary cut?" multilevel health systems analysis of drivers of caesarean sections rates in Italy: a systematic review.

Valentina Laurita Longo, Emmanuel Nene Odjidja, Thierry Kamba Beia, Manuela Neri, Karina Kielmann, Irene Gittardi, Amanda Isabella Di Rosa, Michela Boldrini, Gian Benedetto Melis, Giovanni Scambia and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Classification of caesarean sections by 10 Robson groups in a second level hospital].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Valentina Laurita LongoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cagliari, SS 554 - bivio Sestu, Monserrato, 09032, Cagliari, Italy. valentina.lauritalongo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4071-9936
Emmanuel Nene OdjidjaQueen Margaret University, Institute for Global Health and Development, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU, Scotland, UK.
Thierry Kamba BeiaQueen Margaret University, Institute for Global Health and Development, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU, Scotland, UK.
Manuela NeriDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cagliari, SS 554 - bivio Sestu, Monserrato, 09032, Cagliari, Italy.
Karina KielmannQueen Margaret University, Institute for Global Health and Development, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU, Scotland, UK.
Irene GittardiLegal Department "Luca Santa Maria e associati", Via G. Serbelloni 1, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Amanda Isabella Di RosaQueen Margaret University, Institute for Global Health and Development, Edinburgh, EH21 6UU, Scotland, UK.
Michela BoldriniDepartment of Economics, University of Bologna, Piazza Antonio Scaravilli 2, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Gian Benedetto MelisDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cagliari, SS 554 - bivio Sestu, Monserrato, 09032, Cagliari, Italy.
Giovanni ScambiaCatholic University of Sacred Heart, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Antonio LanzoneCatholic University of Sacred Heart, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Queen Margaret University · GBUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Cagliari · ITCentro Studi Luca d’Agliano · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImprovements in medical technologies have seen over-medicalization of childbirth. Caesarean section (CS) is a lifesaving procedure proven effective in reducing maternal and perinatal mortality across the globe. However, as with any medical procedure, the CS intrinsically carries some risk to its beneficiaries. In recent years, CS rates have risen alarmingly in high-income countries. Many exceeding the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommendation of a 10 to 15% annual CS rate. While this situation poses an increased risk to women and their children, it also represents an excess human and financial burden on health systems. Therefore, from a health system perspective this study systematically summarizes existing evidence relevant to the factors driving the phenomenon of increasing CS rates using Italy as a case study.

methodsEmploying the WHO Health System Framework (WHOHSF), this systematic review used the PRISMA guidelines to report findings. PubMed, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar databases were searched up until April 1, 2020. Findings were organised through the six dimensions of the WHOHSF framework: service delivery, health workforce, health system information; medical products vaccine and technologies, financing; and leadership and governance.

resultsCS rates in Italy are affected by complex interactions among several stakeholder groups and contextual factors such as the hyper-medicalisation of delivery, differences in policy and practice across units and the national context, issues pertaining to the legal and social environment, and women's attitudes towards pregnancy and childbirth.

conclusionMitigating the high rates of CS will require a synergistic multi-stakeholder intervention. Specifically, with processes able to attract the official endorsement of policy makers, encourage concensus between regional authorities and local governments and guide the systematic compliance of delivery units with its clinical guidelines.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionDelivery of Health CareFemaleHospitals, PrivateHospitals, PublicHumansItalyLiability, LegalPractice Patterns, Physicians'PregnancyCaesarean sectionChildbirth overmedicalisationEuropeHealth Systems of WestItalyObstetrics

Identifiers

PMID33302920
PMCPMC7731545
OpenAlexW3112079569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.