Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33302883›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2020

Validation of the interview-based life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS) for older persons with and without cognitive impairment.

Klaus Hauer, Phoebe Ullrich, Patrick Heldmann, Saskia Hummel, Jürgen M Bauer, Christian Werner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Klaus HauerAGAPLESION Bethanien Hospital Heidelberg/Geriatric Centre of the University of Heidelberg, Rohrbacher Str. 149, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany. khauer@bethanien-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8041-5705
Phoebe UllrichAGAPLESION Bethanien Hospital Heidelberg/Geriatric Centre of the University of Heidelberg, Rohrbacher Str. 149, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany.
Patrick HeldmannNetwork Aging Research (NAR), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Saskia HummelMedical Faculty of the Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jürgen M BauerAGAPLESION Bethanien Hospital Heidelberg/Geriatric Centre of the University of Heidelberg, Rohrbacher Str. 149, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian WernerCenter of Geriatric Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-reported life-space assessment methods so far focus on community-dwelling persons, with a lack of validated assessment methods for institutionalized settings. This study evaluated construct validity, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change, and feasibility of a new Life-Space Assessment for Institutionalized Settings (LSA-IS) in geriatric patients.

methodsPsychometric properties of the LSA-IS in 119 hospitalized geriatric patients (83.0 ± 6.2 years) with and without cognitive impairment (CI) [Mini-Mental State Examination: 22.4 ± 4.9 scores] were evaluated within a comprehensive validation design. For the total group and subgroups according to cognitive status, construct validity was assessed by calculating Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (rho) with established construct variables, test-retest reliability by intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), sensitivity to change by standardized response means (SRMs) calculated for effects of early ward-based rehabilitation during hospital stay.

resultsThe LSA-IS (total score) demonstrated good test-retest reliability (ICC = .704), and large sensitivity to change (SRM = .806), while construct validity was small to high indicated by significant correlations of the LSA-IS to construct variables (rho = .208-716), depending on relative construct association. On average results of LSA-IS sub-scores confirmed results of the total score. Subgroups according to cognitive status did not differ for most analyzed variables. A completion rate of 100% and a completion time of 3.2 ± 1.2 min documented excellent feasibility.

conclusionsThe interview-based LSA-IS has proven to be valid, reliable, sensitive, and feasible in hospitalized, multi-morbid, geriatric patients with and without CI documenting good psychometric properties for institutionalized settings.

trial registrationDRKS00016028.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionQuality of LifeActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAssessmentClinical trial methodsCognitive impairmentExerciseLife-space mobilityMeasurementPhysical activityValidation

Identifiers

PMID33302883
PMCPMC7726908
OpenAlexW3111729918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.