Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33302506›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Human Behaviour Change Interventions in Animal Care and Interactive Settings: A Review and Framework for Design and Evaluation.

Carmen Glanville, Charles Abraham, Grahame Coleman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Calling a trade-off a trade-off in arguments for cat confinement.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Owners' Knowledge and Approaches to Colic in Working Equids in Honduras.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Visitor Attitudes Toward Little Penguins (Frontiers in psychology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carmen GlanvilleAnimal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, North Melbourne, VIC 3051, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0754-0822
Charles AbrahamSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood 3125, Australia.
Grahame ColemanAnimal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, North Melbourne, VIC 3051, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9558-789X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behaviour change interventions may be one of the most promising avenues to improve animal welfare. Yet there has been limited systematic research involving them in animal-related settings. We searched three major databases for studies involving an intervention to change interactive or care-related behaviours in any animal-related setting. Forty-seven papers were included in the review and each paper was coded for specific design and evaluation elements. We found a series of limitations in the quality and consistency of intervention design, evaluation, and reporting. Hence, we present a framework, the "Ten-Task" guide, based on the intervention mapping framework, to guide future work in this field. Adopting this structured approach will improve the quality and efficacy of behaviour change interventions for animal welfare and allow for the field to progress in a harmonious way.

Indexed as

animal handlinganimal managementanimal welfarebehaviour changehuman-animal interactionhuman-animal relationshipinterventionprevention

Identifiers

PMID33302506
PMCPMC7764651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.