Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33302449›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

The Response of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Communities to the Soil Environment of Underground Mining Subsidence Area in Northwest China.

Hai Huang, Jing Guo, Yuxiu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hai HuangSchool of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China.
Jing GuoSchool of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China.
Yuxiu ZhangSchool of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fully mechanized mining technology applied over a very large working face is typically utilized for coal exploitation in Northwest China and triggered two types of land subsidence above the goaf edge and center. However, the effects of mining subsidence on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) communities are still unknown. Here, we investigated the soil physicochemical properties and the response of AMF communities to the soil environment at the margin and center of the subsidence area of the same working face. Our results showed the soil water content, nutrient content and enzyme activity were significantly decreased with land desertification at the margin of the subsidence area but were less affected at the subsidence center. Utilizing high-throughput sequence analysis, six Glomeromycotan genera were detected. The relative abundance of Glomus and Ambispora at the margin of the subsidence area decreased, while Paraglomus and Diversispora increased. The total OTU richness was significantly correlated with moisture. Redundancy analysis showed the main environmental factors driving the changes in AMF community structure were available nitrogen, available potassium and available phosphorus. All these results indicated land cracks need to be repaired in time at subsidence edge to prevent the decline of soil fertility.

Indexed as

MiningMycobiomeSoil MicrobiologyChinaMycorrhizaeSoilSoilarbuscular mycorrhizal fungienzyme activitiesmicrobial communitiessoil nutrientssubsidence areasunderground mining

Identifiers

PMID33302449
PMCPMC7763152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.