Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33302228›Full record

ArticleActa psychologica2021

Crossmodal correspondences as common ground for joint action.

Laura Schmitz, Günther Knoblich, Ophelia Deroy, Cordula Vesper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta psychologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura SchmitzDepartment of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary; Institute for Sports Science, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Günther KnoblichDepartment of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary.
Ophelia DeroyFaculty of Philosophy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany; Munich Centre for Neuroscience, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany; Institute of Philosophy, School of Advanced Study, University of London, London, UK.
Cordula VesperDepartment of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Linguistics, Cognitive Science and Semiotics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Interacting Minds Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. Electronic address: cvesper@cc.au.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When performing joint actions, people rely on common ground - shared information that provides the required basis for mutual understanding. Common ground can be based on people's interaction history or on knowledge and expectations people share, e.g., because they belong to the same culture or social class. Here, we suggest that people rely on yet another form of common ground, one that originates in their similarities in multisensory processing. Specifically, we focus on 'crossmodal correspondences' - nonarbitrary associations that people make between stimulus features in different sensory modalities, e.g., between stimuli in the auditory and the visual modality such as high-pitched sounds and small objects. Going beyond previous research that focused on investigating crossmodal correspondences in individuals, we propose that people can use these correspondences for communicating and coordinating with others. Initial support for our proposal comes from a communication game played in a public space (an art gallery) by pairs of visitors. We observed that pairs created nonverbal communication systems by spontaneously relying on 'crossmodal common ground'. Based on these results, we conclude that crossmodal correspondences not only occur within individuals but that they can also be actively used in joint action to facilitate the coordination between individuals.

Indexed as

Touch PerceptionVisual PerceptionAdultAuditory PerceptionFemaleHumansLanguageMaleMiddle AgedTouchYoung AdultCommon groundCommunicationCrossmodal correspondencesJoint actionMultisensory perceptionSocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID33302228
PMCPMC7755874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.