Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33302034›Full record

ReviewInternational immunopharmacology2021

COVID-19 and Hyperimmune sera: A feasible plan B to fight against coronavirus.

Camila B P da Costa, Francislene J Martins, Luis E R da Cunha, Norman A Ratcliffe, Rafael Cisne de Paula, Helena C Castro

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International immunopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 and Blood Safety: An Updated Review.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2022
    Review
  9. UsingExpert opinion on drug discovery · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in medical technology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Camila B P da CostaInstituto Vital Brazil, Niterói, RJ 24230-410, Brazil; Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências e Biotecnologia, IB, UFF, RJ 24210-130, Brazil.
Francislene J MartinsPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências e Biotecnologia, IB, UFF, RJ 24210-130, Brazil.
Luis E R da CunhaInstituto Vital Brazil, Niterói, RJ 24230-410, Brazil.
Norman A RatcliffePrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências e Biotecnologia, IB, UFF, RJ 24210-130, Brazil; Department of Biosciences, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA28PP, UK.
Rafael Cisne de PaulaPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências e Biotecnologia, IB, UFF, RJ 24210-130, Brazil. Electronic address: rafaelcisne@id.uff.br.
Helena C CastroPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências e Biotecnologia, IB, UFF, RJ 24210-130, Brazil; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Patologia, HUAP, UFF, RJ 24210-130, Brazil. Electronic address: hcastro@id.uff.br.
Centro de Excelência em Bioinformática · BRInstituto Vital Brazil (Brazil) · BRSwansea University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the very beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, different treatment strategies have been explored. These mainly involve the development of antimicrobial, antiviral, and/or anti-inflammatory agents as well as vaccine production. However, other potential options should be more avidly investigated since vaccine production on a worldwide level, and the anti-vaccination movement, also known as anti-vax or vaccine hesitancy by many communities, are still real obstacles without a ready solution. This review presents recent findings on the potential therapeutic advantages of heterologous serotherapy for the treatment of COVID-19. We present not only the effective use in animal models of hyperimmune sera against this coronavirus but also strategies, and protocols for the production of anti-SARS-CoV-2 sera. Promising antigens are also indicated such as the receptor-binding domain (RBD) in SARS-CoV-2 S protein, which is already in phase 2/3 clinical trial, and the trimeric protein S, which was shown to be up to 150 times more potent than the serum from convalescent donors. Due to the high death rate, the treatment for those currently infected with coronavirus cannot be ignored. Therefore, the potential use of anti-SARS-CoV-2 hyperimmune sera should be carefully but urgently evaluated in phase 2/3 clinical studies.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2AnimalsCOVID-19COVID-19 SerotherapyHumansImmunization, PassiveAnimal antibodiesCoronavirusCOVID-19Hyperimmune seraNeutralizing titersSARS-COV-2

Identifiers

PMID33302034
PMCPMC7678452
OpenAlexW3098933637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.