Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33302012›Full record

ArticleBioresource technology2021

The effect of augmentation of biochar and hydrochar in anaerobic digestion of a model substrate.

Jessica Quintana-Najera, A John Blacker, Louise A Fletcher, Andrew B Ross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioresource technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessica Quintana-NajeraSchool of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT Leeds, UK.
A John BlackerSchool of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT Leeds, UK; Institute of Process Research and Development, School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT Leeds, UK.
Louise A FletcherSchool of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT Leeds, UK.
Andrew B RossSchool of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT Leeds, UK. Electronic address: a.b.ross@leeds.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The augmentation of biochar produced at 450 and 600-650 °C and hydrochar produced at 250 °C has been investigated using biochemical methane potential experiments of cellulose. The feedstocks used for the char production included the lignocellulosic (oak wood), macroalgae (Fucus serratus) and aquatic plant (water hyacinth). Biomethane production was improved with the addition of lower-temperature biochars from oak wood (285 mL CH

Indexed as

CharcoalMethaneAnaerobiosisWoodbiocharCharcoalMethaneAnaerobic digestionBiocharBiomethaneHydrocharSurface functionality

Identifiers

PMID33302012
PMCPMC7812375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.