Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33301984›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2021

Personalizing Radiotherapy Prescription Dose Using Genomic Markers of Radiosensitivity and Normal Tissue Toxicity in NSCLC.

Jacob G Scott, Geoff Sedor, Jessica A Scarborough, Michael W Kattan, Jeffrey Peacock, G Daniel Grass, Eric A Mellon, Ram Thapa, Michael Schell, Anthony Waller and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Personalization of Radiotherapy Dose in HPV Positive Oropharynx Cancer Using GARD.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Heterogeneity in precision oncology.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Evolution-Informed Strategies for Combating Drug Resistance in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jacob G ScottDepartment of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Geoff SedorCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Jessica A ScarboroughDepartment of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Michael W KattanDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Jeffrey PeacockDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
G Daniel GrassDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Eric A MellonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
Ram ThapaDepartment of Biostatistics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Michael SchellDepartment of Biostatistics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Anthony WallerVarian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California.
Sean PoppenMinnesota Twins, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
George AndlVarian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California.
Jamie K TeerDepartment of Biostatistics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Steven A EschrichDepartment of Biostatistics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Thomas J DillingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
William S DaltonDeBartolo Personalized Medicine Institute, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Louis B HarrisonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Tim FoxVarian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California.
Javier F Torres-RocaDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: javier.torresroca@moffitt.org.

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007250 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, ALEX YEE-CHEN · 1985 to 2023
$33.4M
TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH ONCOLOGY TRAINING GRANTK12CA076917 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GERSON, STANTON L. · 1997 to 2022
$14.2M
Exploiting Ecology and Evolution to Prevent Therapy Resistance in EGFR-Driven Lung CancerR37CA244613 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI Jacob Gardinier Scott · 2020 to 2026
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA076917NCI NIH HHS R37 CA244613NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCancer sequencing efforts have revealed that cancer is the most complex and heterogeneous disease that affects humans. However, radiation therapy (RT), one of the most common cancer treatments, is prescribed on the basis of an empirical one-size-fits-all approach. We propose that the field of radiation oncology is operating under an outdated null hypothesis: that all patients are biologically similar and should uniformly respond to the same dose of radiation.

methodsWe have previously developed the genomic-adjusted radiation dose, a method that accounts for biological heterogeneity and can be used to predict optimal RT dose for an individual patient. In this article, we use genomic-adjusted radiation dose to characterize the biological imprecision of one-size-fits-all RT dosing schemes that result in both over- and under-dosing for most patients treated with RT. To elucidate this inefficiency, and therefore the opportunity for improvement using a personalized dosing scheme, we develop a patient-specific competing hazards style mathematical model combining the canonical equations for tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probability. This model simultaneously optimizes tumor control and toxicity by personalizing RT dose using patient-specific genomics.

resultsUsing data from two prospectively collected cohorts of patients with NSCLC, we validate the competing hazards model by revealing that it predicts the results of RTOG 0617. We report how the failure of RTOG 0617 can be explained by the biological imprecision of empirical uniform dose escalation which results in 80% of patients being overexposed to normal tissue toxicity without potential tumor control benefit.

conclusionsOur data reveal a tapestry of radiosensitivity heterogeneity, provide a biological framework that explains the failure of empirical RT dose escalation, and quantify the opportunity to improve clinical outcomes in lung cancer by incorporating genomics into RT.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsGenomicsHumansPrescriptionsRadiation ToleranceRadiotherapyRadiotherapy DosageMathematical modelingNon–small cell lung cancerPersonalized medicineRadiation oncology

Identifiers

PMID33301984
PMCPMC8549863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.