ArticleJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2021
Personalizing Radiotherapy Prescription Dose Using Genomic Markers of Radiosensitivity and Normal Tissue Toxicity in NSCLC.
Article in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Independent association of metabolic tumor response on FDG-PET with pulmonary toxicity following risk-adaptive chemoradiation for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer: Inherent radiosensitivity or immune response?Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2023Trial
- Novel method for risk stratification of radiation-induced breast fibrosis: subgroup hypothesis verified by machine learning.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Advancing Particle Therapy to Improve Cancer Care: Report on "2nd World Forum on Particle Therapy".International journal of particle therapy · 2026Review
- Radiogenomics and the DNA damage response: opportunities for biomarker-guided radiosensitization in pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Personalized treatment in HPV+ oropharynx cancer using genomic adjusted radiation dose.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025Observational
- Narrative Review of the Use of Genomic-Adjusted Radiation Dose (GARD) in Radiotherapy.Cancers · 2025Review
- Personalization of Radiotherapy Dose in HPV Positive Oropharynx Cancer Using GARD.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Radiation Sensitivity Index and 12-Chemokine Gene Expression Signature for Clinical Use in a CLIA Laboratory.Cancer research communications · 2025Article
- Direct minimization of normal-tissue toxicity via an NTCP-based IMPT planning method.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Radiation Sensitivity Index and 12-chemokine gene expression signature for clinical use in a CLIA laboratory.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Advancing equitable and personalized cancer care: Novel applications and priorities of artificial intelligence for fairness and inclusivity in the patient care workflow.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2024Review
- Heterogeneity in precision oncology.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2024Review
- Review
- Evolution-Informed Strategies for Combating Drug Resistance in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Review
- Current status and future developments in predicting outcomes in radiation oncology.The British journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Nanoradiosensitizer with good tissue penetration and enhances oral cancer radiotherapeutic effect.Biomaterials · 2022Article
- Direct incorporation of patient-specific efficacy and toxicity estimates in radiation therapy plan optimization.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Translation of Precision Medicine Research Into Biomarker-Informed Care in Radiation Oncology.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2022Review
- Theoretical modeling of collaterally sensitive drug cycles: shaping heterogeneity to allow adaptive therapy.Journal of mathematical biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byLetter Response.2021
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCancer sequencing efforts have revealed that cancer is the most complex and heterogeneous disease that affects humans. However, radiation therapy (RT), one of the most common cancer treatments, is prescribed on the basis of an empirical one-size-fits-all approach. We propose that the field of radiation oncology is operating under an outdated null hypothesis: that all patients are biologically similar and should uniformly respond to the same dose of radiation.
methodsWe have previously developed the genomic-adjusted radiation dose, a method that accounts for biological heterogeneity and can be used to predict optimal RT dose for an individual patient. In this article, we use genomic-adjusted radiation dose to characterize the biological imprecision of one-size-fits-all RT dosing schemes that result in both over- and under-dosing for most patients treated with RT. To elucidate this inefficiency, and therefore the opportunity for improvement using a personalized dosing scheme, we develop a patient-specific competing hazards style mathematical model combining the canonical equations for tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probability. This model simultaneously optimizes tumor control and toxicity by personalizing RT dose using patient-specific genomics.
resultsUsing data from two prospectively collected cohorts of patients with NSCLC, we validate the competing hazards model by revealing that it predicts the results of RTOG 0617. We report how the failure of RTOG 0617 can be explained by the biological imprecision of empirical uniform dose escalation which results in 80% of patients being overexposed to normal tissue toxicity without potential tumor control benefit.
conclusionsOur data reveal a tapestry of radiosensitivity heterogeneity, provide a biological framework that explains the failure of empirical RT dose escalation, and quantify the opportunity to improve clinical outcomes in lung cancer by incorporating genomics into RT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.