ReviewComparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology2021
Experiments of nature and within species comparative physiology.
Review in Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Limits of Ultra: Towards an Interdisciplinary Understanding of Ultra-Endurance Running Performance.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Review
- Exercise and Experiments of Nature.Comprehensive Physiology · 2023Article
- Utilizing comparative models in biomedical research.Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This graphical review highlights a focused application of a key principle ('Krogh Principle') identified by Nobel-prize winning physiologist Professor August Krogh (1874-1949) that states "for many problems there is an animal on which it can be most conveniently studied". We apply the Krogh Principle to human physiology by proposing that "for many problems there is a unique group of humans on which it can be most conveniently studied". As such, we present 5 unique human case studies. Case 1 discusses whether signals from exercising muscles cause blood pressure to rise using a patient with a spinal cord lesion. Case 2 investigates the role of the sympathetic nervous system in the blood pressure response to exercise using patients who have undergone sympathectomy for hypertension. Case 3 asks whether increases in blood lactate are necessary for the non-linear increase in breathing with heavy exercise using patients with McArdle's disease. Case 4 applies fundamental scaling principles from comparative physiology to elite athletes to investigate the role of body size on maximal aerobic capacity. Finally, Case 5 describes our recent work that investigates whether a left shift in the oxygen hemoglobin dissociation curve can facilitate hypoxic exercise using patients with left-shifted hemoglobinopathies. In summary, we have expanded the inter-species message of the August Krogh Principle and highlighted the need to search for odd examples and experiments of nature. In this context, observations from unusual humans are a source of insights into physiology, which may be translated into therapeutic approaches for disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.