Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33301693›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)2021

Electronic Health Record Reminders for Chlamydia Screening in an American Indian Population.

Michael Sang Hughes, Andria Apostolou, Brigg Reilley, Jessica Leston, Jeffrey McCollum, Jonathan Iralu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Improved Diabetes Screening for Women After Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael Sang Hughes1811 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Andria Apostolou1246 Indian Health Service, Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2440-9700
Brigg Reilley23762 Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board, Portland, OR, USA.
Jessica Leston23762 Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board, Portland, OR, USA.
Jeffrey McCollum1246 Indian Health Service, Rockville, MD, USA.
Jonathan Iralu1811 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3295-8769

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIndian Health Service (IHS) screening rates for

methodsWe conducted our intervention from November 1, 2013, through October 31, 2015, at an IHS facility in the Southwest. We implemented algorithms that queried database values to assess chlamydia screening performance in 6 clinical departments. We presented data on the screening performance of clinical departments and health care providers (de-identified) in the awareness presentations. We re-queried database values 1 and 2 years after implementation of the EHR reminder intervention to evaluate before-and-after screening rates, comparing data among all patients and among female patients only.

resultsWe found small, sustained relative increases in chlamydia screening rates during the 2012-2015 evaluation period: 20.8% pre-intervention to 24.9% and 24.2% one and two years postintervention, respectively, across all patients; 32.3% preintervention to 36.6% and 35.6% one and two years postintervention, respectively, among female patients. Increases in clinical department-specific screening rates varied and were most prominent in internal medicine (35.8% preintervention to peak 65.8% postintervention). The 1 clinic (obstetrics-gynecology) that did not receive an awareness presentation showed a consistent downward trend in screening rates, although absolute rates were consistently higher in that clinic than in other clinics.

conclusionsAwareness presentations that offer feedback to health care providers on screening performance, heighten provider awareness of the importance of chlamydia screening, and promote development of novel provider-initiated screening protocols may help to increase screening rates when combined with EHR reminders.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmerican Indian or Alaska NativeChlamydia InfectionsElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicPrimary Health CarePublic HealthReminder SystemsSex Factorschlamydiapublic health interventionquality improvementscreeningsexually transmitted disease

Identifiers

PMID33301693
PMCPMC8580389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.