ArticlePloS one2020
Developing and validating the Psychosocial Burden among people Seeking Abortion Scale (PB-SAS).
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seeking Abortion Care Across State Lines After the Dobbs Decision.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- "It Was So Easy in a Situation That's So Hard": Structural Stigma and Telehealth Abortion.Journal of health and social behavior · 2026Article
- Abortion on Request, Contraceptive Access Barriers, and Mental Health-Related Quality of Life Among Women Attending a Romanian Tertiary Center.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Abortion care over 20 weeks gestation: a psychosocial exploration of patient experiences at the Royal Women's Hospital, Victoria, Australia.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Women's reproductive mental health: currently available evidence and future directions for research, clinical practice and health policy.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2025Article
- "It Makes It More Real to You": Abortion Attitudes Following Experience and Contact With Abortion.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2025Article
- Abortion care preferences and trade-offs when traveling out-of-state for facility-based services: findings from a discrete choice experiment.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Catastrophic Health Expenditures for In-State and Out-of-State Abortion Care.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Experiences of delay-causing obstacles and mental health at the time of abortion seeking.Contraception: X · 2024Article
- The Effects of Abortion Decision Rightness and Decision Type on Women's Satisfaction and Mental Health.Cureus · 2023Article
- High Psychosocial Burden Relates to Poorer Antiretroviral Treatment Adherence Among Black/African American People with HIV.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2023Article
- Abortion terminology preferences: a cross-sectional survey of people accessing abortion care.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- A cross-sectional study examining consideration of self-managed abortion among people seeking facility-based care in the United States.Reproductive health · 2022Article
- Prevalence of stress and depression and associated factors among women seeking a first-trimester induced abortion in China: a cross-sectional study.Reproductive health · 2022Article
- Intervals and Outcomes of First and Second Pregnancies in Low-Income Women: A Record-Linkage Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021Article
- Estimating the Period Prevalence of Mothers Who Have Abortions: A Population Based Study of Inclusive Pregnancy Outcomes.Health services research and managerial epidemiologyArticle
- Differences in Financial and Social Burdens Experienced by Patients Traveling for Abortion Care.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's HealthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While there is a large body of research demonstrating that having an abortion is not associated with adverse mental health outcomes, less research has examined which factors may contribute to elevated levels of mental health symptoms at the time of abortion seeking. This study aims to develop and validate a new tool to measure dimensions of psychosocial burden experienced by people seeking abortion in the United States. To develop scale items, we reviewed the literature including existing measures of stress and anxiety and conducted interviews with experts in abortion care and with patients seeking abortion. Thirty-five items were administered to 784 people seeking abortion at four facilities located in three U.S. states. We used exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to reduce items and identify key domains of psychosocial burden. We assessed the predictive validity of the overall scale and each sub-scale, by assessing their associations with validated measures of perceived stress, anxiety, and depression using multivariable linear regression models. Factor analyses revealed a 12-item factor solution measuring psychosocial burden seeking abortion, with four subdomains: structural challenges, pregnancy decision-making, lack of autonomy, and others' reactions to the pregnancy. The alpha reliability coefficients were acceptable for the overall scale (α = 0.83) and each subscale (ranging from α = 0.82-0.85). In adjusted analyses, the overall scale was significantly associated with stress, anxiety and depression; each subscale was also significantly associated with each mental health outcome. This new scale offers a practical tool for providers and researchers to empirically document the factors associated with people's psychological well-being at the time of seeking an abortion. Findings suggest that the same restrictions that claim to protect people from mental health harm may be increasing people's psychosocial burden and contributing to adverse psychological outcomes at the time of seeking abortion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.