Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33301442›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Using environmental DNA methods to survey for rare groundwater fauna: Detection of an endangered endemic cave crayfish in northern Alabama.

Spencer H Boyd, K Denise Kendall Niemiller, Katherine E Dooley, Jennifer Nix, Matthew L Niemiller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Towards evidence-based conservation of subterranean ecosystems.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Spencer H BoydDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, United States of America.
K Denise Kendall NiemillerDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, United States of America.
Katherine E DooleyDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4198-4304
Jennifer NixDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, United States of America.
Matthew L NiemillerDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6353-8797

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conservation and management of subterranean biodiversity is hindered by a lack of knowledge on the true distributions for many species, e.g., the Wallacean shortfall. In recent years, several studies have demonstrated the potential of environmental DNA (eDNA) as an effective approach to detect and monitor biodiversity, including rare, threatened, and endangered taxa. However, there are few eDNA studies of groundwater fauna. Here we report the results of the development and implementation of an eDNA assay targeting a short fragment of the mitochondrial CO1 locus of a critically imperiled cave crayfish, the Sweet Home Alabama Cave Crayfish (Cambarus speleocoopi), known from just four cave systems in the Interior Plateau karst region of northern Alabama. We detected C. speleocoopi DNA from water samples collected at 5 of 16 sites sampled (caves and springs), including two historical sites as well as three additional and potentially new sites in Marshall County, Alabama. All three of these sites were within 2 km of historical sites. Our study is the first to detect a groundwater crustacean in the Interior Plateau karst region. Additionally, our study contributes to the growing literature that eDNA is a viable complementary tool for detection and monitoring of a fauna that is difficult to survey and study using traditional approaches.

Indexed as

CavesAlabamaAnimal DistributionAnimalsArthropod ProteinsAstacoideaBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesDNA, EnvironmentalElectron Transport Complex IVEndangered SpeciesGene ExpressionGroundwaterPolymerase Chain ReactionArthropod ProteinsDNA, EnvironmentalElectron Transport Complex IV

Identifiers

PMID33301442
PMCPMC7728221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.