Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33301428›Full record

Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020

Repeat Administration of Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Tomasz Siwek, Katarzyna Jezierska-Woźniak, Stanisław Maksymowicz, Monika Barczewska, Mariusz Sowa, Wanda Badowska, Wojciech Maksymowicz

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomasz SiwekDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Katarzyna Jezierska-WoźniakLaboratory for Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Stanisław MaksymowiczDepartment of Psychology and Sociology of Health and Public Health, School of Public Health, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Monika BarczewskaDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Mariusz SowaDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Wanda BadowskaDepartment of Clinical Paediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Wojciech MaksymowiczDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate repeated intrathecal injection of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-D MSCs) to patients for treatment of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). MATERIAL AND METHODS Autologous MSCs were isolated from the patients' bone marrow, plated, expanded, harvested, and passaged. Stem cells from a single bone marrow collection were used for 3 injections per patient, given over a 3-month period. Outcomes were measured with the Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R). Participants were observed for a minimum of 6 months before transplantation to assess the natural course of ALS and for the same amount of time after transplantation to compare the rate of disease progression, estimated based on average monthly changes in ALSFRS-R scores. Data from 8 of the 15 participants eligible for the study were analyzed. RESULTS The safety of the MSC injections was confirmed and various effects of the therapy were documented. In patients who had ALS with an inherently slow course, there were no significant changes in the rate of disease progression. In patients who had ALS with an inherently rapid course, slowing of the disease was noted following treatment with MSCs. However, because that subgroup was so small, it was not possible to assess whether the changes were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Identifying groups of patients who are not responding or potentially responding negatively to injection of MSCs may help prevent it from being offered to individuals who may not benefit from the therapy. One of the limitations of this treatment method is the amount of time required for long-lasting preparation of bone marrow-derived MSCs for a disease that is rapidly progressive. Therefore, it is worth looking for other allogeneic sources of stromal cells for these types of injections.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAdultAgedAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsMiddle AgedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33301428
PMCPMC7737405
OpenAlexW3110692113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.