Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33301374›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2021

Contemporary Multi-Institutional Cohort of 550 Cases of Phyllodes Tumors (2007-2017) Demonstrates a Need for More Individualized Margin Guidelines.

Laura H Rosenberger, Samantha M Thomas, Suniti N Nimbkar, Tina J Hieken, Kandice K Ludwig, Lisa K Jacobs, Megan E Miller, Kristalyn K Gallagher, Jasmine Wong, Heather B Neuman and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Phyllodes tumors of the breast: a comprehensive review.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Laura H RosenbergerDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Samantha M ThomasDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Suniti N NimbkarBrigham & Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Tina J HiekenDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Kandice K LudwigDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Lisa K JacobsDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Megan E MillerDepartment of Surgery, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.
Kristalyn K GallagherDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Jasmine WongDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Heather B NeumanDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Jennifer TsengDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Taryn E HassingerDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA.
Tari A KingBrigham & Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
James W JakubDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USDuke Medical Center · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USCase Western Reserve University · USIndiana University School of MedicineJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Virginia Health System · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DONNA NIEDZWIECKI · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePhyllodes tumors (PTs) are rare breast neoplasms, which have little granular data on margins. Current guidelines recommend ≥ 1 cm margins; however, recent data suggest narrower margins are sufficient, and for benign PT, a negative margin may not be necessary.

methodsWe performed an 11-institution contemporary (2007-2017) review of PT practices. Demographics, surgical, and histopathologic data were captured. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association of select covariates with local recurrence (LR).

resultsOf 550 PT patients, the majority underwent excisional biopsy (55.3%, n = 302/546) or lumpectomy (wide excision) (38.5%, n = 210/546). Median tumor size was 30 mm, 68.9% (n = 379) were benign, 19.6% (n = 108) borderline, and 10.5% (n = 58) malignant. Surgical margins were positive in 42% (n = 231) and negative in 57.3% (n = 311). A second operation was performed in 38.0% (n = 209) of the total cohort, including 51 patients with an initial

conclusionIn current practice, many patients are managed outside of current guidelines. For the entire cohort, a wider margin width was not associated with a reduced risk of LR. We do not recommend re-excision of a negative margin for benign PT, regardless of margin width, as a progressively wider surgical margin is unlikely to reduce LR.

Indexed as

Margins of ExcisionAdultBreast NeoplasmsClinical Decision-MakingFemaleHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualPhyllodes TumorPractice Guidelines as TopicRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID33301374
PMCPMC8462612
OpenAlexW3111679444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.