Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33301298›Full record

ArticleACS synthetic biology2021

Plasmid Vectors for

Anton Kan, Ilia Gelfat, Sivaram Emani, Pichet Praveschotinunt, Neel S Joshi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Minicells derived fromApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An Engineered Variant ofACS synthetic biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Probiotic-Based Materials as Living Therapeutics.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anton KanWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
Ilia GelfatWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
Sivaram EmaniWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
Pichet PraveschotinuntWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
Neel S JoshiWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8236-3566
Harvard University · USNortheastern University · US

Funding

Investigating the role of natural and engineered curli fibers in mediating interactions with the gut epitheliumR01DK110770 · NIDDK · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI JOSHI, NEEL SATISH · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK110770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial ProteinsCRISPR-Cas SystemsEscherichia coliGastrointestinal TractGene EditingGene ExpressionGenetic EngineeringMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPlasmidsPromoter Regions, GeneticTemperatureBacterial ProteinsCrl protein, Bacteriamicrobiomeprobiotic engineeringsynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID33301298
PMCPMC7813132
OpenAlexW3113295329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.