Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33301235›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2021

Somatostatin Analogs for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Any Benefit When Ki-67 Is ≥10%?

Elettra Merola, Teresa Alonso Gordoa, Panpan Zhang, Taymeyah Al-Toubah, Eleonora Pellè, Agnieszka Kolasińska-Ćwikła, Wouter Zandee, Faidon Laskaratos, Louis de Mestier, Angela Lamarca and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Is NETTER-2 a practice-changing trial?Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 13 institutions in 8 countries.

Elettra Merola *Department of Gastroenterology, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy.
Teresa Alonso Gordoa *Medical Oncology Department. The Ramon y Cajal Health Research Institute, University Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Panpan Zhang *Department of Early Drug Development Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Taymeyah Al-ToubahMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Eleonora PellèMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Agnieszka Kolasińska-ĆwikłaDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy and Department of Radiology, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, 02-034, Warsaw, Poland.
Wouter ZandeeErasmus Medical Center and Erasmus MC Cancer Center, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Faidon LaskaratosNeuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Louis de MestierDepartment of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Beaujon Hospital and Université de Paris, Clichy, France.
Angela LamarcaThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Jorge HernandoVall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Jaroslaw CwiklaUniversity of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Jonathan StrosbergMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Wouter de HerderErasmus Medical Center and Erasmus MC Cancer Center, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Martin CaplinNeuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Mauro CivesDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3013-1816
Rachel van LeeuwaardeDepartment of Endocrine Oncology University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Moffitt Cancer Center · USErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBHôpital Beaujon · FRInstituto Cajal · ESPeking University Cancer Hospital · CNProvincia Autonoma di Trento · ITThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn · PLVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-acting somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are the primary first-line treatment of well-differentiated advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), but data about their efficacy in pancreatic NETs (panNETs) with Ki-67 ≥10% are still limited. MATERIALS AND

methodsTo assess the clinical outcomes of advanced, nonfunctioning, well-differentiated panNETs with Ki-67 ≥10% receiving first-line long-acting SSAs in a real-world setting, we carried out a retrospective, multicenter study including patients treated between 2014-2018 across 10 centers of the NET CONNECT Network. The primary endpoints were time to next treatment (TNT) and progression-free survival (PFS), whereas overall survival (OS) and treatment safety were secondary endpoints.

resultsA total of 73 patients were included (68 grade [G]2, 5 G3), with liver metastases in 61 cases (84%). After a median follow-up of 36.4 months (range, 6-173), the median TNT and PFS were 14.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.6-16.2) and 11.9 months (95% CI, 8.6-14.1) respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed according to the somatostatin analog used (octreotide vs. lanreotide), whereas increased tumor grade (hazard ratio [HR], 4.4; 95% CI, 1.2-16.6; p = .04) and hepatic tumor load (HR, 2; 95% CI, 1-4; p = .03) were independently associated with shortened PFS. The median OS recorded was 86 months (95% CI, 56.8-86 months), with poor outcomes observed when the hepatic tumor burden was >25% (HR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.2-10; p = .01). Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 14 patients, most frequently diarrhea.

conclusionSSAs exert antiproliferative activity in panNETs with Ki-67 ≥10%, particularly in G2 tumors, as well as when hepatic tumor load is ≤25%. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The results of the study call into question the antiproliferative activity of somatostatin analogs (SSAs) in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with Ki-67 ≥10%. Patients with grade 2 tumors and with hepatic tumor load ≤25% appear to derive higher benefit from SSAs. Prospective studies are needed to validate these results to optimize tailored therapeutic strategies for this specific patient population.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansKi-67 AntigenProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSomatostatinKi-67 AntigenMKI67 protein, humanSomatostatinG2G3Hepatic tumor loadLanreotideOctreotidePancreatic neuroendocrine tumor

Identifiers

PMID33301235
PMCPMC8018333
OpenAlexW3111770786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.