Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33301190›Full record

ArticleDermatologic therapy2021

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the management of patients with chronic urticaria: An observational two-center study from Turkey.

Yasemin Erdem, Algün Polat Ekinci, Ilknur Kivanc Altunay, Onur Sivaz, Sena Inal, Mehmet Onur Gokalp, Gizem Pehlivan, Esen Özkaya

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatologic therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The effect of COVID-19 on patients recieving omalizumab treatment.Revue francaise d'allergologie (2009) · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yasemin ErdemSisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Department of Dermatology, Health Science University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6597-2957
Algün Polat EkinciIstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4056-8402
Ilknur Kivanc AltunaySisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Department of Dermatology, Health Science University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1354-7123
Onur SivazSisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Department of Dermatology, Health Science University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7606-9587
Sena InalSisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Department of Dermatology, Health Science University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8840-4015
Mehmet Onur GokalpIstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5617-1229
Gizem PehlivanIstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5906-3976
Esen ÖzkayaIstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9585-9509
Istanbul University · TRSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak significantly affected the clinical practice in hospitals and the management of many diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pandemic-related factors on the severity and course of chronic urticaria (CU). A total of 194 CU patients who were on regular follow-up, were enrolled in the study. The disease activity was assessed by means of the weekly urticaria activity score (UAS7) and urticaria control test (UCT). Patients were divided into two subgroups according to their disease aggravation as "aggravated" and "non-aggravated". Two groups were compared in terms of demographic, clinical, COVID-19-associated parameters, and parameters related with the effect of COVID-19 pandemic on CU management. The omalizumab use was statistically higher (P = .017), and the systemic corticosteroid use was statistically lower (P = .025) in the "aggravated" group. Adherence to quarantine was significantly lower in the "aggravated" group (P = .027). 173 patients (89.2%) were unable to contact a dermatologist during the pandemic. Among 186 patients who received treatment for CU before the pandemic, 48 (25.8%) did not continue the existing treatment during the pandemic. CU aggravated in one patient with COVID-19 and remained stable in the other. This study showed that CU patients, especially those on omalizumab therapy, had difficulties in attending medical care and even in the maintenance of their existing therapies during the pandemic. Creating novel follow-up and treatment models as well as the increased use of teledermatology might be beneficial in the management of this life-disturbing condition.

Indexed as

Chronic UrticariaCOVID-19UrticariaAnti-Allergic AgentsChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOmalizumabPandemicsSARS-CoV-2TurkeyAnti-Allergic AgentsOmalizumabchronic urticariaCOVID-19managementomalizumabpandemicUAS7UCT

Identifiers

PMID33301190
PMCPMC7883220
OpenAlexW3110768168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.