Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33301105›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2020

European Society of Emergency Radiology: guideline on radiological polytrauma imaging and service (short version).

Stefan Wirth, Julian Hebebrand, Raffaella Basilico, Ferco H Berger, Ana Blanco, Cem Calli, Maureen Dumba, Ulrich Linsenmaier, Fabian Mück, Konraad H Nieboer and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Pneumothorax and Hemothorax: Practical Approaches for Radiologists.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. CTA Imaging of Peripheral Arterial Injuries.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Stefan WirthEuropean Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria. wirth.online@googlemail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4576-3987
Julian HebebrandDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Raffaella BasilicoEuropean Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria.
Ferco H BergerEuropean Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria.
Ana BlancoEuropean Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria.
Cem CalliEuropean Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria.
Maureen DumbaEuropean Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria.
Ulrich LinsenmaierEuropean Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria.
Fabian MückEuropean Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria.
Konraad H NieboerEuropean Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria.
Mariano ScaglioneEuropean Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria.
Marc-André WeberEuropean Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria.
Elizabeth DickEuropean Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough some national recommendations for the role of radiology in a polytrauma service exist, there are no European guidelines to date. Additionally, for many interdisciplinary guidelines, radiology tends to be under-represented. These factors motivated the European Society of Emergency Radiology (ESER) to develop radiologically-centred polytrauma guidelines.

resultsEvidence-based decisions were made on 68 individual aspects of polytrauma imaging at two ESER consensus conferences. For severely injured patients, whole-body CT (WBCT) has been shown to significantly reduce mortality when compared to targeted, selective CT. However, this advantage must be balanced against the radiation risk of performing more WBCTs, especially in less severely injured patients. For this reason, we recommend a second lower dose WBCT protocol as an alternative in certain clinical scenarios. The ESER Guideline on Radiological Polytrauma Imaging and Service is published in two versions: a full version (download from the ESER homepage, https://www.eser-society.org ) and a short version also covering all recommendations (this article).

conclusionsOnce a patient has been accurately classified as polytrauma, each institution should be able to choose from at least two WBCT protocols. One protocol should be optimised regarding time and precision, and is already used by most institutions (variant A). The second protocol should be dose reduced and used for clinically stable and oriented patients who nonetheless require a CT because the history suggests possible serious injury (variant B). Reading, interpretation and communication of the report should be structured clinically following the ABCDE format, i.e. diagnose first what kills first.

Indexed as

EuropeGuidelinePolytraumaRadiologyWhole-body-CT

Identifiers

PMID33301105
PMCPMC7726597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.