Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33301099›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Retrotransposable Elements: DNA Fingerprinting and the Assessment of Genetic Diversity.

Ruslan Kalendar, Alexander Muterko, Svetlana Boronnikova

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Genetic Diversity and Pathogenicity ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ruslan KalendarDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Viikki Plant Science Centre and Helsinki Sustainability Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. ruslan.kalendar@helsinki.fi.
Alexander MuterkoThe Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Svetlana BoronnikovaDepartment of Botany and Genetics of Plants, Faculty of Biology, Perm State University, Perm, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrotransposable elements (RTEs) are highly common mobile genetic elements that are composed of several classes and make up the majority of eukaryotic genomes. The "copy-out and paste-in" life cycle of replicative transposition in these dispersive and ubiquitous RTEs leads to new genome insertions without excision of the original element. RTEs are important drivers of species diversity; they exhibit great variety in structure, size, and mechanisms of transposition, making them important putative components in genome evolution. Accordingly, various applications have been developed to explore the polymorphisms in RTE insertion patterns. These applications include conventional or anchored polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and quantitative or digital PCR with primers designed for the 5' or 3' junction. Marker systems exploiting these PCR methods can be easily developed and are inexpensively used in the absence of extensive genome sequence data. The main inter-repeat amplification polymorphism techniques include inter-retrotransposon amplified polymorphism (IRAP), retrotransposon microsatellite amplified polymorphism (REMAP), and Inter-Primer Binding Site (iPBS) for PCR amplification with a single or two primers.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationRetroelementsDNA FingerprintingDNA PrimersGenetic MarkersMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, GeneticDNA PrimersGenetic MarkersRetroelementsiPBSIRAPMolecular markerREMAPRetrotransposon

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.